DX: Make TypeExpression API more explicit about composite types
#8214
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Wirone
force-pushed
the
codito/improve-type-expression-api
branch
from
ae0ee40 to
f542ff7
Compare
kubawerlos
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2024
Wirone
force-pushed
the
codito/improve-type-expression-api
branch
from
f542ff7 to
979ef4e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Method
isUnionType()was misleading, because it was returningtruealso for intersection types. SinceTypeExpressionis marked as@internal, it's safe to refactor it and change the API.