-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 316 regions #378
Issue 316 regions #378
Conversation
@gleckler1 I forgot to update the all_options param file Let's talk tomorrow |
@doutriaux1 looks like the graphics tests are continuing to fail everything else looks like it's working well.. |
@durack1 @doutriaux1 graphics failures much less of a concern that the statistics results |
taking a stab at it today. |
@doutriaux1 checking now... initial tests look good as does organization of output interpolated clims.... one issue is that for single level data (e.g., 'ta-850') issue #367 has not been fixed, e.g.: |
@doutriaux1 awesome advancement of the PMP! Apart from issue #367 the only problem I've found is with variable 'tas' (see below) ... maybe has to do with singleton dimension? REGION: {'domain': Selector(<cdutil.region.DomainComponent instance at 0x7f4160fc5f80>), 'id': 'SHEX'} |
@durack1 @gleckler1 test suite is fixed now! param file updated. Ready to be merged at your convenience. |
@doutriaux1 Everything is looking good but still getting error below with TAS... with attached parameter file... OBS SHAPE IS (12, 24, 144) |
@doutriaux1 appended .txt to parameter file since upload does not accept .py |
@gleckler1 did you mean to close this PR without merging the branch into |
@doutriaux1 @durack1 Did not mean do close it. Waiting for tas bug to be fixed before accepting pull request... |
@doutriaux1 was also planning on getting the |
@durack1 the mac will probably happen in another branch later, this is not a high priority issue. |
@gleckler1 should have fixed your issue and also Curt issue while at it. |
@doutriaux1 is creation of filename for single level data of interpolated clims also fixed? |
in another PR after this one. |
@gleckler1 @doutriaux1 woo hoo.. |
@doutriaux1 @gleckler1 what does this merge close, we have standing: #252, #343, #361, #367, #372, #373, #374 and #375 - or see https://github.com/PCMDI/pcmdi_metrics/milestone/7 |
@doutriaux1 @durack1 it looks like it does not include the "demo" PR #376 : |
@durack1 @glecker1 let's review carefully