We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author Name: Carlos Martín (Carlos Martín) Original Redmine Issue: 4750, https://dev.opennebula.org/issues/4750 Original Date: 2016-08-26
Currently there are Virtual Router instances, but we don't support Virtual Router Templates ready to be instantiated.
From this other ticket: #4732 Requested as a way to pre-define NICs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Kristian Feldsam (Kristian Feldsam) Original Date: 2016-09-12T09:10:43Z
Hello, would be fine to able define "gateway" interface, because actual context scripts counts with interface "eth0"
https://github.com/OpenNebula/addon-context-alpine/blob/master/etc/one-context.d/00-network#L82
Also be good able to select if enable SNAT/Masquerade on that gateway interface.
In future port forwarding functionality using OneGate token.
I can cooperate on this and contribute to context scripts.
Sorry, something went wrong.
F #3951: Fix provider form with hide credentials (#1092)
cefab36
87f1715
2384d48
(cherry picked from commit cefab36)
No branches or pull requests
Author Name: Carlos Martín (Carlos Martín)
Original Redmine Issue: 4750, https://dev.opennebula.org/issues/4750
Original Date: 2016-08-26
Currently there are Virtual Router instances, but we don't support Virtual Router Templates ready to be instantiated.
From this other ticket: #4732
Requested as a way to pre-define NICs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: