replaced more term tracker items with annotation #1850

[madbkr]

Summary of the discussion

This is a follow-up PR of #1922
See issue #1850

Type of change (CHANGELOG.md)

Update

Replaced missing term tracker item with term tracker annotation in

• oeo-import-edits.owl
• oeo-physical-axioms.owl
• oeo-shared-axioms.omn

Workflow checklist

Automation

Closes #1850

PR-Assignee

• 🐙 Follow the Pull Request Workflow
• 📝 Update the CHANGELOG.md
• 📙 Add #'s to term tracker item

Reviewer

• 🐙 Follow the Reviewer Guide
• 🐙 Provided feedback and show sufficient appreciation for the work done

[l-emele]

In oeo-shared-axioms.omn there are also a couple of term tracker item left.

[stap-m]

We have owl files now, not omn files. Therefore, the replacement has to consider the prefixes as well. IAO has an obo prefix, but the new oeo class needs an oeo prefix, which is not there yet. @madbkr do you want to try fixing this or should we take a look together on monday?

[madbkr]

I replaced everything in 'oeo-shared-axioms.omn' now.
I also tried to fix the prefixed by replacing obo:OEO_00020426 with oeo:OEO_00020426. But since a check failed this obviously didn't work as planned.
So yes, I'd be happy to look at it on monday. @stap-m
Maybe oeo:OEO_00020426 is missing a declaration?

[l-emele]

I also tried to fix the prefixed by replacing obo:OEO_00020426 with oeo:OEO_00020426. But since a check failed this obviously didn't work as planned.

As the OEO is imported as base, OEO entities should probably not have any prefix.

[stap-m]

As the OEO is imported as base, OEO entities should probably not have any prefix.

Yes, for oeo-shared-axioms.
For oeo-import-edits we need an oeo prefix, I guess.
EDIT: and as well for oeo-physical-axioms.

[l-emele]

Were all changes related to the term trackers done with a simple text editor and not with Protégé? Then it would be good to run the changes through Protégé that Protégé can do all the rearrangements.

Else, future PR gets cluttered with rearrangements and the intentional changes of these future PRs get obfuscated.

[stap-m]

@madbkr We have a release planned for Tuesday and there are some PRs waiting for these changes, therefore I declared the prefixes and made protege rearrange the files by minor changes.
I'll now review.
@l-emele can you please also review?

[l-emele]

The changes in the owl files look fine and I assume Protégé does its job in the omn files properly.
So I approve this PR.