Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide empty collection as fallback in foreach loop #2965

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mrsuciu
Copy link
Contributor

@mrsuciu mrsuciu commented Jan 24, 2025

Proposed changes

Describe the changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.

Related Issues

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce?
Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR.

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Test enhancement (non-breaking change to increase test coverage)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected, requires version increase of Nuget packages)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc.
  • I have signed the CLA.
  • I ran tests locally with my changes, all passed.
  • I fixed all failing tests in the CI pipelines.
  • I fixed all introduced issues with CodeQL and LGTM.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage.
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate).
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.40%. Comparing base (f7815c8) to head (ff1f582).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ies/Opc.Ua.Server/Diagnostics/CustomNodeManager.cs 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2965      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.40%   55.40%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         352      352              
  Lines       67859    67859              
  Branches    13908    13908              
==========================================
- Hits        37598    37597       -1     
- Misses      26136    26142       +6     
+ Partials     4125     4120       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mrsuciu mrsuciu requested review from romanett and mregen January 24, 2025 14:51
Copy link
Contributor

@romanett romanett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find an explicit null check before the loop more readable. Please also fix dispose method of customNodeManager, this is a regression from #2915

Copy link
Contributor

@mregen mregen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another option were to initialize m_predefinedNodes in the constructor and get rid of all the null checks

@romanett
Copy link
Contributor

#2966

@mrsuciu mrsuciu closed this Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CustomNodeManager2.AddReverseReferences crashes in foreach loop when m_predefinedNodes is null
3 participants