Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

source/erf: validate record length before read - v1 #4783

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jasonish
Copy link
Member

@jasonish jasonish commented Apr 6, 2020

Check the ERF record length before attempting to read it as
a record length less than the size of the record header
is invalid.

Redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/3593

PRScript output (if applicable):

Check the ERF record length before attempting to read it as
a record length less than the size of the record header
is invalid.

Redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/3593
@jasonish jasonish requested a review from a team as a code owner April 6, 2020 17:17
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

In general, do we have ERF tests? Does SV even support the format?

@jasonish
Copy link
Member Author

jasonish commented Apr 6, 2020

In general, do we have ERF tests? Does SV even support the format?

No, and no.

@victorjulien victorjulien mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2020
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #4788, thanks Jason.

@jasonish jasonish deleted the issue-3593-erf-rlen/v1 branch July 1, 2021 17:18
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
victorjulien added a commit to victorjulien/suricata that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
For registration of app-layer inspection, no longer use the 'needs'
table from the script, but instead use the rule hook setting.

Ticket: OISF#4783.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants