Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fuzz: better init for signature parsing target #12505

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
No ticket, fuzz target bug, https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/u/1/issues/391975646

Describe changes:

  • fuzz: improve initialization for fuzz_siginit target (signature parsing)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.71%. Comparing base (cfbf8fd) to head (d48f967).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12505      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.56%   80.71%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         925      925              
  Lines      259292   259292              
==========================================
+ Hits       208906   209283     +377     
+ Misses      50386    50009     -377     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 56.82% <ø> (+0.67%) ⬆️
livemode 19.39% <ø> (ø)
pcap 44.18% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 63.42% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unittests 58.44% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Jan 30, 2025
@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 24443

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #12507, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants