Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: update eBPF/compilation instructions v5 #10837

Closed

Conversation

lukashino
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up of #10788

Link to Redmine tickets:

Describe changes:
v5

  • inlined and shortened PATH variable edits in the RPM section
  • added minimal/recommended builds to the GH workflow from Ubuntu and Almalinux
  • added literalincludes to the docs from the Github builds
  • removed gosu from Github builds
  • added DPDK to the list of recommended dependencies

v4

  • inlined and shortened PATH variable edits in the Rust section
  • can be cloned - be added

v3

  • updates to the docs per Jeff's suggestions
  • removed the instruction to install i386 headers for the eBPF

v2

  • remove recommended configure parameters

v1

  • small edit in eBPF instructions to prefer libbpf-dev package to the cloning&compilation
  • porting changes from the improved version of installation instructions that got merged into master-6.0.x

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.86%. Comparing base (365a66a) to head (1194a14).
Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10837      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.67%   82.86%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         928      913      -15     
  Lines      247912   246847    -1065     
==========================================
- Hits       204952   204559     -393     
+ Misses      42960    42288     -672     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.37% <ø> (+0.36%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 62.08% <ø> (+0.08%) ⬆️
unittests 62.34% <ø> (+0.16%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@lukashino lukashino closed this Apr 14, 2024
@lukashino
Copy link
Contributor Author

Didn't pass the CI checks, reopened in #10840

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant