libgeotiff: 1.7.3 -> 1.7.4 #387159
Merged
libgeotiff: 1.7.3 -> 1.7.4 #387159
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nix-owners
bot
requested review from
MarcWeber,
l0b0,
sikmir,
imincik,
nialov,
nh2,
autra and
willcohen
imincik
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://github.com/OSGeo/libgeotiff/releases.
meta.description for libgeotiff is: Library implementing attempt to create a tiff based interchange format for georeferenced raster imagery
meta.homepage for libgeotiff is: https://github.com/OSGeo/libgeotiff
meta.changelog for libgeotiff is: https://github.com/OSGeo/libgeotiff/blob/1.7.4/libgeotiff/NEWS
Updates performed
To inspect upstream changes
Release on GitHub
Compare changes on GitHub
Impact
Checks done
passthru.tests, if any, passedRebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)
Either download from the cache:
(The nixpkgs-update cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the cached download to work, your user must be in the
trusted-userslist or you can usesudosince root is effectively trusted.Or, build yourself:
Or:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build results
We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.
This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.
nixpkgs-reviewresultGenerated using
nixpkgs-review.Command:
nixpkgs-reviewx86_64-linux⏩ 9 packages marked as broken and skipped:
❌ 2 packages failed to build:
✅ 186 packages built:
Maintainer pings
cc @autra @imincik @l0b0 @nh2 @nialov @sikmir @willcohen @MarcWeber for testing.
Tip
As a maintainer, if your package is located under
pkgs/by-name/*, you can comment@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot mergeto automatically merge this update using thenixpkgs-merge-bot.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.