python3Packages.bip_utils: 2.2.1 -> 2.7.0

[StarGate01]

Description of changes

This PR continues / supersedes the PR #181247 by @onny , it fixes and updates the bip_utils Python package.

The previous blocker PyO3/pyo3#5 has since been resolved in 0.11.0, however the dependency https://github.com/polkascan/py-sr25519-bindings did not yet update to the fixed version >=0.11.0 of PyO3. Because of this, the Cargo dependency file is patched here based on a pending PR Patched upstream. This small upgrade compiles and runs without issues, upgrading to PyO3 0.17.2 (the most recent one) would break py-sr25519-bindings .

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[prusnak]

https://github.com/polkascan/py-sr25519-bindings did not yet update to the fixed version >=0.11.0 of PyO3.

Why don't you send a pull request to py-sr25519-bindings and fetch patch from GitHub rather than providing it in nixpkgs tree?

[StarGate01]

@prusnak

Why don't you send a pull request to py-sr25519-bindings and fetch patch from GitHub rather than providing it in nixpkgs tree?

Thank you for the suggestion, I opened and implemented polkascan/py-sr25519-bindings#10 .

[prusnak]

Package sr25519-bindings does not build on darwin because of missing iconv.

Please add libiconv conditionally to buildInputs : buildInputs = lib.optionals stdenv.isDarwin [ libiconv ];

[StarGate01]

Thanks, it now appears to build correctly on darwin.

[risicle]

How were we getting away without half of these before? The package's requirements don't appear to have changed a lot since 2.5.1.

[StarGate01]

I am not sure myself, but found the packages to be required at runtime when actually trying to use the library. I suspect they might have slipped though earlier.

[StarGate01]

@SuperSandro2000 @risicle Thanks for your suggestions, I have implemented the proposed changes. The tests of py-sr25519-bindings required adding a new package py-bip39-bindings.

[onny]

Please merge commits if possible