Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add call args playground validation and fix multiple token inputs issue #430

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ukorvl
Copy link
Member

@ukorvl ukorvl commented Feb 27, 2025

fixes #23

This diff fixes several issues related to playground.

Firs off, it fixes the problem with multiple token inputs, described in #424 by extending object, which stores the values and adding 1 more depth level to it for each of the smart contract functions.

The second issue it fixes - lack of client side smart contract function input fields validation. The diff introduces new effector domain for validation of call params, including validation of tuples.

Also, it fixes the display of result of a smart contract function call. Sometimes result can be an array of values, that are returned by function, and we want to display them using comma separator with additional space , .

It fixes the problem with extra spaces at the beginning of rpc url, like https://, which were considered invalid, by trimming the value before validation.

Additionally it moves some modules, which is not a significant change.

Screen.Recording.2025-02-28.at.00.39.16.mov

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ createSmartAccountFx.use(async ({ privateKey, rpcUrl }) => {
{
smartAccountAddress: smartAccount.address,
faucetAddress: tokenFaucetAddress,
amount: 10,
amount: 10n,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's kinda small? if it's wei it's just 0.00...0001

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, let me check.

@ukorvl
Copy link
Member Author

ukorvl commented Feb 28, 2025

Converting this to draft because will be able to merge only after vacation.

@ukorvl ukorvl marked this pull request as draft February 28, 2025 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
playground Related to playground interface
Projects
None yet
2 participants