Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor improvements for arrow_filter_policy #654

Conversation

mhaseeb123
Copy link
Contributor

@mhaseeb123 mhaseeb123 commented Dec 10, 2024

This PR make the hasher to arrow_filter_policy a template type for users to simply pass the hasher without specifying the Key type twice. See this comment for discussion: #653 (comment). Also update member types argument_type and hash_result_type to directly use Key and std::uint64_t for this policy.

Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Dec 10, 2024

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@mhaseeb123 mhaseeb123 marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 21:26
@PointKernel
Copy link
Member

/ok to test

@PointKernel PointKernel added type: improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function topic: bloom_filter Issues related to bloom_filter helps: rapids Helps or needed by RAPIDS labels Dec 10, 2024
@PointKernel
Copy link
Member

/ok to test

Copy link
Member

@PointKernel PointKernel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the quick fix @mhaseeb123

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
helps: rapids Helps or needed by RAPIDS topic: bloom_filter Issues related to bloom_filter type: improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants