-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modifications to exp2 ceiling diagnostic for RRFS #46
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
@@ -2190,23 +2197,24 @@ SUBROUTINE CLDRAD | |||
end do | |||
!-- end of search 2 | |||
|
|||
zceil = min(zceil1,zceil2) ! choose lower of zceil1 and zceil2 | |||
! zceil = min(zceil1,zceil2) ! choose lower of zceil1 and zceil2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is zceil2 from the summation principle? Is that why it's ignored?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@joeolson42 Yes, the preceding lines define zceil2 which is from the summation principle.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. I just left one comment to make sure the summation principle impact was removed.
This PR modifies the exp2 ceiling diagnostic for RRFS. The cloud fraction threshold has been increased from 0.4 to 0.5, and several "add-ons", useful for correcting the HRRR's underprediction of clouds, have been commented out, including (1) the summation principle (achieved by ignoring the zceil2 calculated using the summation principle) and (2) the lowering of ceilings due to falling snow.
If anyone wants to look at the sample maps from RRFS_CONUS before and after the change, I can share those. The revision increases ceiling height, as expected. The code was tested in both RRFS_CONUS_3km and RRFS_NA_3km on Jet.
Old formulation of exp2:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:mean=9393.89:min=28.5117:max=20000
Revised formulation of exp2:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:mean=10314.5:min=28.5117:max=20000