Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable ESMF threading in the ufs-weather-model forecast #1371
Enable ESMF threading in the ufs-weather-model forecast #1371
Changes from 10 commits
0453d5d
d904cc9
0ade235
5c1e48b
9ba87a8
67b2760
435879b
27bc311
6c5ef9f
e6865cf
c796911
2a2b4a5
a2874b2
3690332
7b483c2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me, this is mostly for the commented out:
#layout_x_gfs=24
#layout_y_gfs=16
#WRTTASK_PER_GROUP_GFS=86
However, with the move to 32bit this might be a little bit less. Plus we can probably show people how to update this in config.ufs instead, so yes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please follow: layout_x < layout_y. Also I am not sure how the WRTTASK_PER_GROUP_GFS=86 is coming out, it may be related to taking whole nodes, but it is really machine dependent, the number may not be good for wcoss2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @JessicaMeixner-NOAA
The uncommented ones are hidden.
I am inclined to remove these as they are not wildly different than the ones in
config.ufs
and the tests ran w/ the ones inconfig.ufs
.