-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CTSM 5.3 Spinup and HIST on ne30 grid #66
Comments
|
The last ne30 simulation I ran used this one: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/lnd/clm2/surfdata_esmf/ctsm5.2.0/surfdata_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850_78pfts_c240216.nc It had pg3 in the name. |
Ok, pg3 it is then. |
The new one seems to be complete, so I'll use that: /glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/temp_work/new_rawdata/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/surfdata_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850_78pfts_c240905.nc |
@olyson I don't know if you followed last week's events (after I took off for the weekend on Thurs). I am not 100% caught up, but I assume that this simulation needs to wait for the newest ne30 fsurdat file. For info, see ESCOMP/CTSM#2500 (comment) |
Yes, thanks, I stopped it. |
I submitted a new I'm generating the new datasets with the new escomp tag |
Thanks for following up here @slevis-lmwg and @olyson I think we're all on the same page (waiting on ne30spinup until after new surface datasets are made), but we can touch base in regularly scheduled meetings this week. |
@olyson the new fsurdat/landuse files:
|
I've restarted the spinup with the new fsurdat file. Although has anyone plotted up the soil texture to verify it is good? |
I'll do that now. Good idea |
I realized the purpose of this run is to generate initial conditions for use in coupled model simulations. This is great, but it also presents challenges as the CRUJRA forcing data doesn't have data over Antarctica, which caused issues in SMILE extensions. I wanted to raise the issue here, but likely need to have a discussion with @dlawrenncar, Sam L and Keith about how to address this? |
Description:
Identical to #65, but on the ne30 grid. This can be a full historical run so we also get a restart in 2000 for B or F2000 cases. Are there other years we should have here for CAM testing (e.g. 1979?).
09/11/24 - STOPPED because fire model was not actually on in the tag used here.
Case directory:
Locally:
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_AD Done
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_SASU
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_pSASU
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_hist
Sandbox:
Locally:
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027
git describe: branch_tags/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027
user_nl_ changes:
AD
SASU difference from AD
pSASU diff from SASU
hist diff from pSASU
SourceMods:
NONE
Diagnostics:
Output:
Output (if still available):
/glade/scratch/oleson/archive/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_AD
Contacts:
@olyson
Extra details:
AD: 240 yrs, 2.82% disequilibrium
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: