Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CTSM 5.3 Spinup and HIST on ne30 grid #66

Closed
wwieder opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 13 comments
Closed

CTSM 5.3 Spinup and HIST on ne30 grid #66

wwieder opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 13 comments

Comments

@wwieder
Copy link
Collaborator

wwieder commented Sep 5, 2024

Description:
Identical to #65, but on the ne30 grid. This can be a full historical run so we also get a restart in 2000 for B or F2000 cases. Are there other years we should have here for CAM testing (e.g. 1979?).
09/11/24 - STOPPED because fire model was not actually on in the tag used here.


Case directory:
Locally:
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_AD Done
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_SASU
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_pSASU
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027/cime/scripts/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_hist


Sandbox:
Locally:
/glade/work/oleson/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027
git describe: branch_tags/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027


user_nl_ changes:
AD

fsurdat = '/glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/temp_work/new_rawdata/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/surfdata_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850_78pfts_c240908.nc'

hist_fincl1 = 'TOTECOSYSC', 'TOTECOSYSN', 'TOTSOMC', 'TOTSOMN', 'TOTVEGC', 'TOTVEGN', 'TLAI', 'GPP', 'CPOOL', 'NPP', 'TWS','H2OSNO'

! turn off shifting cultivation
do_grossunrep = .false.

! do this for isotopes
use_c13 = .true.
use_c14 = .true.
use_c13_timeseries = .true.
use_c14_bombspike = .true.

SASU difference from AD


pSASU diff from SASU


hist diff from pSASU



SourceMods:
NONE


Diagnostics:


Output:
Output (if still available):
/glade/scratch/oleson/archive/ctsm53n02ctsm52027_ne30pg3t232_AD


Contacts:
@olyson


Extra details:

AD: 240 yrs, 2.82% disequilibrium

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Collaborator

@olyson

  1. I pushed tag branch_tags/ctsm5.3.n02_ctsm5.2.027 to escomp, so you should be able to check it out now. This represents the most current version of the branch in PR CTSM5.3.0: New raw pft/lai/glc-behavior/soilcolor/fire datasets ESCOMP/CTSM#2500 (i.e. this commit).
  2. I have already started make all. Depending on how soon you can start CTSM 5.3 Spinup and HIST on ne30 grid #66, you can pick which fsurdat file to use:
  • already existing /glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/temp_work/new_rawdata/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/make_all_20240830/surfdata_ne30np4_hist_1850_78pfts_c240830.nc with the CAVEAT that you pointed out that you need a specific ne30 grid, and I do not remember if it's this one or pg2 or pg3. Same comment for the corresponding landuse.timeseries_ne30np4_SSP2-4.5_1850-2100_78pfts_c240830.nc.
  • in the queue to be generated soon, likely in the next few hours /glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/temp_work/new_rawdata/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/surfdata_ne30np4_hist_1850_78pfts_c240905.nc and landuse.timeseries_ne30np4_SSP2-4.5_1850-2100_78pfts_c240905.nc with the same CAVEAT regarding pg2/pg3.

@olyson
Copy link
Collaborator

olyson commented Sep 5, 2024

The last ne30 simulation I ran used this one:

/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/lnd/clm2/surfdata_esmf/ctsm5.2.0/surfdata_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850_78pfts_c240216.nc

It had pg3 in the name.

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok, pg3 it is then.

@olyson
Copy link
Collaborator

olyson commented Sep 5, 2024

The new one seems to be complete, so I'll use that:

/glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/temp_work/new_rawdata/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/surfdata_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850_78pfts_c240905.nc

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Collaborator

@olyson I don't know if you followed last week's events (after I took off for the weekend on Thurs). I am not 100% caught up, but I assume that this simulation needs to wait for the newest ne30 fsurdat file. For info, see ESCOMP/CTSM#2500 (comment)

@olyson
Copy link
Collaborator

olyson commented Sep 9, 2024

Yes, thanks, I stopped it.

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Collaborator

I submitted a new make all a few minutes ago, so the new ne30 file should be ready by morning.

I'm generating the new datasets with the new escomp tag branch_tags/ctsm5.3.n03_ctsm5.2.028 in case this matters.

@wwieder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wwieder commented Sep 9, 2024

Thanks for following up here @slevis-lmwg and @olyson I think we're all on the same page (waiting on ne30spinup until after new surface datasets are made), but we can touch base in regularly scheduled meetings this week.

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Collaborator

@olyson the new fsurdat/landuse files:

/glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/temp_work/new_rawdata/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/surfdata_ne30np4.pg3_hist_1850_78pfts_c240908.nc
/glade/derecho/scratch/slevis/temp_work/new_rawdata/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/landuse.timeseries_ne30np4.pg3_SSP2-4.5_1850-2100_78pfts_c240908.nc

@olyson
Copy link
Collaborator

olyson commented Sep 9, 2024

I've restarted the spinup with the new fsurdat file. Although has anyone plotted up the soil texture to verify it is good?

@wwieder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wwieder commented Sep 9, 2024

I'll do that now. Good idea

@wwieder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wwieder commented Sep 9, 2024

Africa's back, here for %Sand, but also good for clay and organic
image

@wwieder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wwieder commented Sep 11, 2024

I realized the purpose of this run is to generate initial conditions for use in coupled model simulations. This is great, but it also presents challenges as the CRUJRA forcing data doesn't have data over Antarctica, which caused issues in SMILE extensions. I wanted to raise the issue here, but likely need to have a discussion with @dlawrenncar, Sam L and Keith about how to address this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants