Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Cycle feature should save index #235

Closed
2 tasks done
Dhairy2003 opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

✨ Cycle feature should save index #235

Dhairy2003 opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Dhairy2003
Copy link

Feature Request Description

I love the custom cycle , but it would be much better if it an just save up the last index it used for a window. That would just save up a lot of time to get to the desired layout.

Screenshots

Screen.Recording.2024-03-01.at.12.34.00.PM.mov

Additional Context

if a particular window is already in index 0 , Loop should not suggest index 0 ans should start from index 1

Final Checks

  • My issue title is descriptive
  • This is a single feature request (multiple feature requests should be reported individually)
@Dhairy2003 Dhairy2003 changed the title ✨ Cycle should save index ✨ Cycle feature should save index Mar 1, 2024
@MrKai77
Copy link
Owner

MrKai77 commented Mar 1, 2024

Oh interesting idea! I will definitely look into this :)
This would be really useful when a user has a really long cycle keybind set!

@MrKai77 MrKai77 self-assigned this Mar 1, 2024
@Soft-Bred
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed. I never knew how to phrase it. I've been running into this for a while.

MrKai77 added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2024
@MrKai77 MrKai77 linked a pull request May 17, 2024 that will close this issue
@MrKai77 MrKai77 removed a link to a pull request May 30, 2024
@MrKai77 MrKai77 changed the title ✨ Cycle feature should save index ✨ Cycle feature should save index Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants