Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: nullable contractType for getNFTMetadata. #579

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 10, 2022

Conversation

b4rtaz
Copy link
Collaborator

@b4rtaz b4rtaz commented Aug 10, 2022


name: nullable contractType for getNFTMetadata.

New Pull Request

Checklist

  • I am not disclosing a vulnerability.
  • My code is conform the code style
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have updated Typescript definitions when needed

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 10, 2022

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: aea6993

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 8 packages
Name Type
@moralisweb3/evm-api Patch
@moralisweb3/evm-utils Patch
moralis Patch
@moralisweb3/core Patch
@moralisweb3/auth Patch
@moralisweb3/api-utils Patch
@moralisweb3/sol-utils Patch
@moralisweb3/sol-api Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@b4rtaz b4rtaz changed the title nullable contractType for getNFTMetadata. fix: nullable contractType for getNFTMetadata. Aug 10, 2022
@b4rtaz b4rtaz marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2022 17:17
@b4rtaz b4rtaz requested a review from ErnoW August 10, 2022 17:17
ErnoW
ErnoW previously approved these changes Aug 10, 2022
@b4rtaz b4rtaz enabled auto-merge (squash) August 10, 2022 17:39
@b4rtaz b4rtaz merged commit 30f69c3 into main Aug 10, 2022
@b4rtaz b4rtaz deleted the fix/nullable-contract-type branch August 10, 2022 17:40
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants