-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Json Schema #67
Conversation
…54d4 99a54d4 Update V2.3-RC to V2.3-RC2 (#67) 3d8926c Revert "Update name tag to 2.3-RC2" ed57408 Revert "Changes to return_types" 2749dce Revert "Extend vehicle types" 7029048 Revert "Update vehicle_types.json with car sharing extention" e249fc2 Revert "fix typo in vehicle_types.json" 8b5f600 fix typo in vehicle_types.json 539f06f Update vehicle_types.json with car sharing extention 5ec98f3 Extend vehicle types c8a4389 Changes to return_types 6eacd24 Update name tag to 2.3-RC2 f5e1a59 Improved schema (#66) git-subtree-dir: gbfs-validator/versions/schemas git-subtree-split: 99a54d4b9dd0e7dc9165f19182047dabc438593c
❌ Deploy Preview for wizardly-engelbart-5c48ca failed.
|
❌ Deploy Preview for competent-payne-690ca9 failed.
|
❌ Deploy Preview for kind-pike-a3f3f8 failed.
|
✅ Deploy Preview for unruffled-hugle-914373 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
✅ Deploy Preview for gbfs-validator ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
❌ Deploy Preview for wizardly-lichterman-770f54 failed.
|
…2044 5e02044 Fix type (#70) git-subtree-dir: gbfs-validator/versions/schemas git-subtree-split: 5e02044c90491f2e2804b619b8030692b39cf4a0
@isabelle-dr I believe you have a unit test failing because it's trying to read the schema from the wrong path due to this fixture: Change the version on this line to '2.3-RC2' and I think it will pass again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, apart from the failing unit test, which should be easy to fix 👍
@PierrickP Still failing 😕 I can't seem to find why. |
Well it seems like it does 🙈. I updated the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I think we need to hold this up. There is a breaking change in vehicle_types.json here, which is the requirement of default_pricing_plan_id. Mitch was going to look into it. Meanwhile, I'm having a look at the tests.
Here is a PR into this branch that fixes the issue: #68 I still think we need to remove the requirement condition on default_pricing_plan_id though. |
Fix v 2.3-RC2 partials
Thanks @testower, i merged your PR to fix this PR. @isabelle-dr you renamed RC to RC2. Should we NOT keep old RCs ? |
@isabelle-dr default_pricing_plan_id has been made completely optional in 2.3-RC2 now, can you update this PR so we can get it merged? |
Hello! @PierrickP after a discussion with @mplsmitch to confirm, we decided to replace V2.3 with V2.3-RC2 because they have been released at dates that are really close. We don't really want to encourage users to implement V2.3-RC. @testower the requirement condition on |
@isabelle-dr Thanks |
Closes #65
This change includes: