Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to support UPM packages for glTF #631

Conversation

ms-RistoRK
Copy link
Contributor

@ms-RistoRK ms-RistoRK commented Feb 2, 2024

Fixes #630
Fixes #883

Copy link
Contributor

@keveleigh keveleigh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

Copy link
Contributor

@AMollis AMollis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer to leave the GLTF package in the sample project. To continue to validate controller model loading.f

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ms-RistoRK ms-RistoRK left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe to have attended the requested changes, please re-review.

AMollis
AMollis previously requested changes Feb 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@AMollis AMollis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would like @keveleigh to sign off on the changes, since they have more knowledge on this area.

Update manifest.json
@ms-RistoRK ms-RistoRK marked this pull request as draft February 6, 2024 17:55
@ms-RistoRK
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abandoning this PR as we don't have the resources to exhaustively test on all devices where MRTK3 is deployed and the bandwidth issue with com.atteneder.ktx package is an accepted known issue.

@keveleigh keveleigh force-pushed the Bug630FixRemovingWrongPackageReferences branch from 3a7079f to 10acdc1 Compare January 9, 2025 22:44
@keveleigh keveleigh changed the title Bug630 fix - Removing wrong package references Updating sample project to use UPM packages for glTF Jan 9, 2025
@keveleigh keveleigh self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@keveleigh keveleigh force-pushed the Bug630FixRemovingWrongPackageReferences branch from 10acdc1 to 1c43b9b Compare January 9, 2025 22:54
Update ControllerModelLoader.cs

Update ControllerModelLoader.cs
@keveleigh keveleigh force-pushed the Bug630FixRemovingWrongPackageReferences branch 2 times, most recently from 9507104 to 8cb85ed Compare January 9, 2025 23:47
@keveleigh keveleigh marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 00:22
@keveleigh keveleigh dismissed stale reviews from AMollis and themself January 10, 2025 00:22

Updated

@keveleigh keveleigh changed the title Updating sample project to use UPM packages for glTF Update to support UPM packages for glTF Jan 10, 2025
@keveleigh keveleigh force-pushed the Bug630FixRemovingWrongPackageReferences branch from 17d0ee4 to 95eaa95 Compare January 28, 2025 18:40
@MaxPalmer-UH MaxPalmer-UH self-requested a review February 3, 2025 14:07
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxPalmer-UH MaxPalmer-UH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to work well either with the template project from within the repo or adding packages to an existing project and then validating/fixing dependencies. I don't see the issues linked with this branch (#630 & #883)

Note, I did once see errors with missing meta files for part of the KTX package when opening the template project, but my assumption is that this was a project path length problem and also wasn't an MRTK issue.

image

@keveleigh
Copy link
Contributor

Note, I did once see errors with missing meta files for part of the KTX package when opening the template project, but my assumption is that this was a project path length problem and also wasn't an MRTK issue.

Ah yeah, I also saw these. Looks like an issue with the way Unity packed their package, but it shouldn't affect our implementation even when they fix it. Thank you for the review!!

@keveleigh keveleigh merged commit f0dde8f into MixedRealityToolkit:main Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants