-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to support UPM packages for glTF #631
Update to support UPM packages for glTF #631
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to leave the GLTF package in the sample project. To continue to validate controller model loading.f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe to have attended the requested changes, please re-review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like @keveleigh to sign off on the changes, since they have more knowledge on this area.
Update manifest.json
Abandoning this PR as we don't have the resources to exhaustively test on all devices where MRTK3 is deployed and the bandwidth issue with com.atteneder.ktx package is an accepted known issue. |
3a7079f
to
10acdc1
Compare
10acdc1
to
1c43b9b
Compare
Update ControllerModelLoader.cs Update ControllerModelLoader.cs
9507104
to
8cb85ed
Compare
17d0ee4
to
95eaa95
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems to work well either with the template project from within the repo or adding packages to an existing project and then validating/fixing dependencies. I don't see the issues linked with this branch (#630 & #883)
Note, I did once see errors with missing meta files for part of the KTX package when opening the template project, but my assumption is that this was a project path length problem and also wasn't an MRTK issue.
Ah yeah, I also saw these. Looks like an issue with the way Unity packed their package, but it shouldn't affect our implementation even when they fix it. Thank you for the review!! |
Fixes #630
Fixes #883