Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor analyzeGasUsage to return results #8487

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2020

Conversation

Gudahtt
Copy link
Member

@Gudahtt Gudahtt commented Apr 30, 2020

analyzeGasUsage now returns the results of the analysis rather than setting them directly on txMeta. The caller is now responsible for mutating txMeta instead. Functionally this should be identical to before.

`analyzeGasUsage` now returns the results of the analysis rather than
setting them directly on `txMeta`. The caller is now responsible for
mutating `txMeta` instead. Functionally this should be identical to
before.
@Gudahtt Gudahtt force-pushed the refactor-analyze-gas-usage branch from f31b863 to 153b6e5 Compare April 30, 2020 23:57
@Gudahtt Gudahtt changed the base branch from skip-gas-limit-estimation-when-specified to develop April 30, 2020 23:57
@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds ready [153b6e5]
Page Load Metrics (651 ± 19 ms)
PlatformPageMetricMin (ms)Max (ms)Average (ms)StandardDeviation (ms)MarginOfError (ms)
ChromeHomefirstPaint307641126
domContentLoaded6027536504019
load6037556514019
domInteractive6017536494019

@Gudahtt Gudahtt marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2020 00:23
@Gudahtt Gudahtt requested a review from a team as a code owner May 1, 2020 00:23
Copy link
Member

@rekmarks rekmarks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Gudahtt Gudahtt merged commit c2b5889 into develop May 1, 2020
@whymarrh whymarrh deleted the refactor-analyze-gas-usage branch May 1, 2020 00:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants