Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

transactions - run event emitters outside context of _setTxStatus #4131

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2018

Conversation

frankiebee
Copy link
Contributor

@frankiebee frankiebee commented Apr 29, 2018

this wraps emitters so they excute safely

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds ready [a71b49c]: mascara, chrome, firefox, edge, opera

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds ready [7eb7356]: mascara, chrome, firefox, edge, opera

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Builds ready [98ae853]: mascara, chrome, firefox, edge, opera

this.updateTx(txMeta, `txStateManager: setting status to ${status}`)
this.emit(`${txMeta.id}:${status}`, txId)
this.emit(`tx:status-update`, txId, status)
if (['submitted', 'rejected', 'failed'].includes(status)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should break this utility out

@kumavis kumavis merged commit 099fc09 into master Apr 30, 2018
@kumavis kumavis deleted the emitter-cleanup branch April 30, 2018 17:42
Gudahtt added a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2020
All transaction status updates were moved into a `setTimeout` callback
and wrapped in a `try...catch` block in #4131, apparently in an attempt
to prevent failures in event subscribers from interrupting the
transaction logic. The `try...catch` block did accomplish that, but by
putting the status update in a `setTimeout` callback the operation was
made asynchronous.

Transaction status updates now happen unpredictably, in some future
event loop from when they're triggered. This creates a race condition,
where the transaction status update may occur before or after
subsequent state changes. This also introduces a risk of accidentally
undoing a change to the transaction state, as the update made to the
transaction inside the `setTimeout` callback uses a reference to
`txMeta` obtained synchronously before the `setTimeout` call. Any
replacement of the `txMeta` between the `setTxStatus` call and the
execution of the timeout would be erased. Luckily the `txMeta` object
is more often than not mutated rather than replaced, which may explain
why we haven't seen this happen yet.

Everything seems to work correctly with the `setTimeout` call removed,
and now the transaction logic is easier to understand.
Gudahtt added a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2020
All transaction status updates were moved into a `setTimeout` callback
and wrapped in a `try...catch` block in #4131, apparently in an attempt
to prevent failures in event subscribers from interrupting the
transaction logic. The `try...catch` block did accomplish that, but by
putting the status update in a `setTimeout` callback the operation was
made asynchronous.

Transaction status updates now happen unpredictably, in some future
event loop from when they're triggered. This creates a race condition,
where the transaction status update may occur before or after
subsequent state changes. This also introduces a risk of accidentally
undoing a change to the transaction state, as the update made to the
transaction inside the `setTimeout` callback uses a reference to
`txMeta` obtained synchronously before the `setTimeout` call. Any
replacement of the `txMeta` between the `setTxStatus` call and the
execution of the timeout would be erased. Luckily the `txMeta` object
is more often than not mutated rather than replaced, which may explain
why we haven't seen this happen yet.

Everything seems to work correctly with the `setTimeout` call removed,
and now the transaction logic is easier to understand.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants