Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/dhfprod 1715 mapping #1941

Merged
merged 62 commits into from
Mar 1, 2019
Merged

Conversation

aebadirad
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

aebadirad and others added 30 commits February 7, 2019 10:12
# Conflicts:
#	marklogic-data-hub/src/main/resources/ml-modules/root/data-hub/5/impl/config-lib.sjs
* Creating FlowRunner, Collector and listeners

* Implement the new Collector

* Pass "step" to ml:runFlow endpoint
Implemented:
  createFlowRecord(flowId, options)  -- currently unused, as I don't believe flow info is tracked, just the use of the flow.
  createJobRecord(jobId, flowId, info)
  createStepRecord(jobId, flowId, stepType, docURI, info) {

TODO:
 * Wrap use of provenance API in eval() statement & point to JOBDATABASE
 * Incorporate info.metadata property key/values into provenance data
 * Create query function to search by document uri and return full history
 * Tombstone prov function when a document is deleted (need to determine what this is)
…ess.sjs, adding default metadata timestamps to mlcp-flow-transforms, and adding a default 'dummy' main.sjs process to test flows with
Add RunLegacyFlowTask for 4.x flows
Add access to FlowRunnerImpl in FlowManager
aebadirad and others added 19 commits February 22, 2019 18:34
* Get resource as stream to work in both jar file and via IDE

* Add LoadHubArtifactsCommand to deploy default steps and flows

* Adds capability to iterate over all dirs under flows and steps
…ng to ingest with, tweaks to mlcp-flow-transform to handle it
…cast values according to datatype, todo: still handle arrays
…hat are for the legacy flow running to use runlegacy task instead
* Remove dummy flow file

* Update hubDeployArtifact test to account for default flows as well
@aebadirad aebadirad changed the title DO NOT MERGE - Feature/dhfprod 1715 mapping Feature/dhfprod 1715 mapping Mar 1, 2019
@aebadirad aebadirad requested review from srinathgit, akshaysonvane and clockworked247 and removed request for srinathgit and clockworked247 March 1, 2019 01:34
@aebadirad aebadirad merged commit b1924ea into develop Mar 1, 2019
@aebadirad aebadirad deleted the feature/DHFPROD-1715-Mapping branch March 1, 2019 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants