Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(timer.f90): cleanup docstrings in Timer utility #1600

Merged

Conversation

emorway-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@emorway-usgs emorway-usgs added the maintenance Sprucing up the code label Feb 8, 2024
if (it == 0) then
call cpu_time(t1)
else
call cpu_time(dt)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@langevin-usgs what should the convention be for fortran intrinsics? It might be good use CAPS like we use for parameters (DZERO, etc.).

Copy link
Contributor Author

@emorway-usgs emorway-usgs Feb 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jdhughes-usgs I deliberated on this one, so happy to restore. See 635cdb7

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have a preference. Will go with whatever is in here now. Ultimately hoping for a linter to handle this.

@jdhughes-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

@emorway-usgs it was a question. Maybe @langevin-usgs has a different opinion.

@langevin-usgs langevin-usgs merged commit 6004b5a into MODFLOW-ORG:develop Feb 9, 2024
15 checks passed
@emorway-usgs emorway-usgs deleted the cleanup_timer_docstrings branch February 9, 2024 18:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Sprucing up the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants