-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update output names to match BIDS derivatives RC2 conventions #146
Comments
This is brought up in the Roadmap PR, but since this issue already exists I figured I'd ask about it there. I haven't read the full specification, but my understanding is that derivatives should follow the format Also, since tedana operates on derivatives, how should the filename from the input derived data be incorporated into the tedana output? For example, if we were using fMRIPrep output (I know that fMRIPrep will integrate tedana, but it's a good example with well-known outputs): Inputs:
Output possibilities:
|
Here is a list of tedana's outputs (copied from #17). I think it's comprehensive, but if not just let me know and I can add missing derivatives. This is just a first pass, and I have no clue how many of the derivatives should be named.
Old outputs
|
We should add comments to the BEP012 draft to make sure all of our derivatives are covered ! I'll go through these later this week, myself, with that in mind. |
As in #540, I think it makes sense to just not include naming information from the original files in the output files. So instead of |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity in 90 days. It will be closed in 600 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions to tedana:tada: ! |
It might be nice to have a note in the documentation that the bids convention won't include the base filename. I've just stumbled on the fact that if you're not careful when running over multiple sessions or runs, outputs will get overwritten. |
I can incorporate that into #822. Thanks for bringing it up! |
@Shotgunosine WDYT of this? The warning admonition in the middle, specifically. |
Looks great, thanks!
…On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:58 PM Taylor Salo ***@***.***> wrote:
@Shotgunosine <https://github.com/Shotgunosine> WDYT of this?
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8228902/144657971-c9d6a114-2314-4ae1-a6f7-0d9037e19051.png>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#146 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABILLGBGG64WPMVQ3SMCE3TUPEHPHANCNFSM4GAG5YSA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Now that BIDS Derivatives has released the RC2 status, it's quite close to stable.
We should, therefore, update our naming conventions to match these so that we can more easily interoperate with the broader BIDS community.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: