Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cherry pick neutron #191

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mantrachain-support
Copy link

@mantrachain-support mantrachain-support commented Sep 30, 2024

  • fix
  • additional tests

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • run make lint and make test
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced multi-send functionality with additional account addresses for improved validation.
    • Updated coin transfer process with robust checks and tracking mechanisms.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of restrictions and hooks during coin transfers to ensure compliance with predefined conditions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the testing framework and functionality of the bank module in the Cosmos SDK. New account addresses are introduced for multi-send test cases, improving the validation of coin transfers. Additionally, the BaseSendKeeper struct methods are updated to include more robust checks and tracking mechanisms for coin transfers, ensuring that restrictions are enforced prior to sending coins.

Changes

File Change Summary
x/bank/app_test.go Added new account addresses (addr4, addr5) and expanded test cases for multi-send functionality. Updated TestHooks with new assertions for coin transfers.
x/bank/keeper/send.go Enhanced InputOutputCoins, SendCoins, and sendCoins methods with additional checks and tracking for output addresses and restrictions before sending coins.

Possibly related PRs

  • add neutron bank #3: The changes in this PR enhance the testing framework for bank hooks, which directly relates to the updates made in the main PR regarding the TestHooks function and the tracking of coin transfers.

Suggested reviewers

  • freeelancer

Poem

In the bank where coins do flow,
New addresses help the tests to grow.
With hooks and checks, we send with care,
Ensuring transfers are always fair.
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer,
For a robust bank, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@mantrachain-support your pull request is missing a changelog!

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
x/bank/app_test.go (2)

580-580: Swap arguments in require.Equal for clarity

The require.Equal function expects the expected value as the first argument and the actual value as the second. Currently, countTrackBeforeSend (actual) is passed first and expNextCount (expected) second. Swapping them will improve the clarity of test failure messages.

Apply this diff to swap the arguments:

     require.NoError(t, err)
-    require.Equal(t, countTrackBeforeSend, expNextCount)
+    require.Equal(t, expNextCount, countTrackBeforeSend)

602-602: Swap arguments in require.Equal for clarity

As before, ensure that the require.Equal function has the expected value as the first argument and the actual value as the second. Swapping the arguments will improve the clarity of test failure messages.

Apply this diff to swap the arguments:

     expNextCount += 4
-    require.Equal(t, countTrackBeforeSend, expNextCount)
+    require.Equal(t, expNextCount, countTrackBeforeSend)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4cd1bea and c3c9e0c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • x/bank/app_test.go (2 hunks)
  • x/bank/keeper/send.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
x/bank/keeper/send.go (3)

167-179: Addition of BlockBeforeSend and TrackBeforeSend hooks in InputOutputCoins

The inclusion of BlockBeforeSend and TrackBeforeSend hooks within the loop over outputs ensures that necessary restrictions are enforced and transactions are appropriately tracked for each output. This enhances the security and auditability of multi-send operations.


Line range hint 216-219: Invocation of BlockBeforeSend in SendCoins method

By calling BlockBeforeSend before initiating the coin transfer in the SendCoins method, you ensure that any sending restrictions are checked prior to the transfer. This is crucial for maintaining compliance and preventing unauthorized transactions.


Line range hint 227-229: Inclusion of TrackBeforeSend in sendCoins method

Adding the TrackBeforeSend hook at the beginning of the sendCoins method ensures that all transfers are properly tracked. This enhances the system's ability to audit and monitor transactions effectively.

x/bank/app_test.go (1)

66-67: New addresses addr4 and addr5 added correctly

The new addresses addr4 and addr5 are properly initialized and follow the existing pattern.

x/bank/app_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@mantrachain-support mantrachain-support changed the title cherry pick neutron fix: cherry pick neutron Oct 1, 2024
@mantrachain-support mantrachain-support merged commit ae5e4ce into release/v0.50.x Oct 1, 2024
43 checks passed
@freeelancer freeelancer deleted the cherry-pick-neutron branch December 10, 2024 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants