Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MapPNextStructHandles should traverse chain till end #1994

Conversation

panos-lunarg
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ci-tester-lunarg
Copy link

CI gfxreconstruct build queued with queue ID 356903.

@ci-tester-lunarg
Copy link

CI gfxreconstruct build # 5936 running.

@ci-tester-lunarg
Copy link

CI gfxreconstruct build # 5936 passed.

Copy link
Contributor

@MarkY-LunarG MarkY-LunarG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but Zulauf should really look this over as well since he's actively still working the codegen.

@panos-lunarg
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM, but Zulauf should really look this over as well since he's actively still working the codegen.

Saw your name in git blame on neighboring lines and summoned you.
I am a bit concerned that this wasn't detected earlier.

@MarkY-LunarG
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, but Zulauf should really look this over as well since he's actively still working the codegen.

Saw your name in git blame on neighboring lines and summoned you. I am a bit concerned that this wasn't detected earlier.

Yes, apparently our tests aren't good enough to catch this. This was part of the code refactor and we've caught other errors, but this is the concern that as we touch code we'll have things slip in like this. Good catch.

@panos-lunarg panos-lunarg merged commit 03695a3 into LunarG:dev Jan 28, 2025
9 checks passed
@panos-lunarg panos-lunarg deleted the MapPNextStructHandles_should_traverse_chain_till_end branch January 28, 2025 12:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants