Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User module Controllers seperated #50

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2025
Merged

User module Controllers seperated #50

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2025

Conversation

SaiemAziz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 22, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced dedicated endpoints for administrators, mentors, mentees, and users, delivering a complete set of operations for managing each user type.
  • Chores

    • Integrated enhanced API documentation support through an updated dependency.
  • Refactor

    • Consolidated creation and update functionality using unified data models.
    • Retired legacy endpoints in favor of specialized controllers for improved clarity and maintainability.

Walkthrough

The changes update several DTO classes by renaming them from Create*Dto to CreateUpdate*Dto for admins, mentees, and mentors. New API controllers have been introduced for admins, mentees, mentors, and users with complete CRUD operations, and the old aggregate UsersController has been removed. Additionally, the IUserServices interface, mapping profiles, and service implementation have been updated to accommodate these new DTOs. A new package reference for Swashbuckle.AspNetCore has also been added.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
backend/BuildingBlocks/.../DTOs/Users/AdminDto.cs
backend/BuildingBlocks/.../DTOs/Users/MenteeDto.cs
backend/BuildingBlocks/.../DTOs/Users/MentorDto.cs
Renamed classes from CreateAdminDto, CreateMenteeDto, and CreateMentorDto to CreateUpdateAdminDto, CreateUpdateMenteeDto, and CreateUpdateMentorDto respectively.
backend/MentorConnect.API/MentorConnect.API.csproj Added package reference for Swashbuckle.AspNetCore version 7.2.0.
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/AdminControllers.cs
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/MenteeControllers.cs
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/MentorControllers.cs
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/UserControllers.cs
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/Controllers.cs (removed)
Introduced new controllers with full CRUD endpoints for admins, mentees, mentors, and users; removed the old UsersController.
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Contracts/IUserServices.cs Updated method signatures to accept the new CreateUpdate*Dto types and added new methods for updating and deleting admin, mentor, and mentee entities.
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/AdminProfile.cs
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/MenteeProfile.cs
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/MentorProfile.cs
Modified AutoMapper configurations to map from the updated CreateUpdate DTOs instead of the original Create DTOs.
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Services/UserServices.cs Updated methods for adding users to use the new DTOs and introduced new methods for updating and deleting user roles that currently throw NotImplementedException.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as Client
    participant AC as AdminController
    participant US as UserServices
    participant AM as AutoMapper
    Client->>AC: POST /api/admins (CreateUpdateAdminDto)
    AC->>US: AddAdmin(dto)
    US->>AM: Map CreateUpdateAdminDto to Admin
    AM-->>US: Admin object
    US->>AC: Return GetAdminDto
    AC-->>Client: Response with admin data
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Beep boop, the code upgrades shine so bright,
New DTOs merge creation with update in pure byte light.
Controllers now command the flow with precision,
Mapping and services join in our updated mission.
CodeRabbit circuits sing in a rhythm so neat –
Geeky Bot cheers, making our changes complete!
🤖✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Warhammer4000
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 22, 2025

Deploy Preview for mentor-connect-learnathon canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d337991
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/mentor-connect-learnathon/deploys/67b9472a0038e300082b92d0

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 16

🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
backend/BuildingBlocks/MentorConnect.BuildingBlocks.SharedKernel/DTOs/Users/AdminDto.cs (1)

5-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

BEEP BOOP: ANALYZING ID PROPERTY USAGE IN CREATE/UPDATE DTO

OBSERVATION: ID PROPERTY DETECTED IN CREATE/UPDATE DTO. LOGICAL ERROR DETECTED.

  • FOR CREATE OPERATIONS: ID SHOULD BE GENERATED SERVER-SIDE
  • FOR UPDATE OPERATIONS: ID IS REQUIRED

RECOMMENDED ACTION: IMPLEMENT SEPARATE DTOS OR ADD VALIDATION LOGIC. EXECUTING SUGGESTION:

 public class CreateUpdateAdminDto
 {
-    public Guid Id { get; set; }
+    public Guid? Id { get; set; }  // Optional for create, required for update
     public string? Extra { get; set; }
 }

ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION: ADD VALIDATION ATTRIBUTES TO ENFORCE BUSINESS RULES.

backend/BuildingBlocks/MentorConnect.BuildingBlocks.SharedKernel/DTOs/Users/MenteeDto.cs (1)

5-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

BEEP BOOP: DETECTING CODE DUPLICATION AND ID PROPERTY ISSUE

OBSERVATION 1: IDENTICAL STRUCTURE DETECTED IN MULTIPLE DTOs
OBSERVATION 2: ID PROPERTY HANDLING REQUIRES ATTENTION

RECOMMENDED ACTION 1: CREATE BASE DTO TO REDUCE DUPLICATION:

public abstract class BaseCreateUpdateDto
{
    public Guid? Id { get; set; }
    public string? Extra { get; set; }
}

public class CreateUpdateMenteeDto : BaseCreateUpdateDto
{
    // Add mentee-specific properties here
}

RECOMMENDED ACTION 2: APPLY SAME ID PROPERTY FIX AS IN ADMINDTO

backend/BuildingBlocks/MentorConnect.BuildingBlocks.SharedKernel/DTOs/Users/MentorDto.cs (1)

5-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

BEEP BOOP: PATTERN ANALYSIS COMPLETE

OBSERVATION: IDENTICAL PATTERN DETECTED ACROSS ALL USER TYPE DTOS.

EXECUTING COMPREHENSIVE REFACTOR SUGGESTION:

  1. IMPLEMENT BASE DTO AS SUGGESTED PREVIOUSLY
  2. APPLY CONSISTENT VALIDATION
  3. ADD XML DOCUMENTATION
/// <summary>
/// DTO for creating or updating a Mentor
/// </summary>
public class CreateUpdateMentorDto : BaseCreateUpdateDto
{
    // Add mentor-specific properties here
}

RECOMMENDATION: APPLY THIS PATTERN ACROSS ALL USER TYPE DTOS FOR CONSISTENCY.

backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Services/UserServices.cs (1)

96-103: ⚠️ Potential issue

CRITICAL: INCORRECT ENTITY MAPPING

ERROR! CRITICAL! Mentee is being mapped to Admin entity.

-        var mentee = _mapper.Map<Admin>(menteeInfo);
+        var mentee = _mapper.Map<Mentee>(menteeInfo);
         mentee.CreateTime();
-        await _userRepository.AddAdminAsync(mentee);
+        await _userRepository.AddMenteeAsync(mentee);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 013d3c7 and d337991.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • backend/BuildingBlocks/MentorConnect.BuildingBlocks.SharedKernel/DTOs/Users/AdminDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/BuildingBlocks/MentorConnect.BuildingBlocks.SharedKernel/DTOs/Users/MenteeDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/BuildingBlocks/MentorConnect.BuildingBlocks.SharedKernel/DTOs/Users/MentorDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/MentorConnect.API/MentorConnect.API.csproj (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/AdminControllers.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/Controllers.cs (0 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/MenteeControllers.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/MentorControllers.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/UserControllers.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Contracts/IUserServices.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/AdminProfile.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/MenteeProfile.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/MentorProfile.cs (1 hunks)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Services/UserServices.cs (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/Controllers.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.API/Controllers/UserControllers.cs (2)

1-6: BEEP BOOP! DEPENDENCIES SCAN COMPLETE.

Dependencies analysis indicates optimal import selection. No redundant or missing dependencies detected.


8-12: EXECUTING CONTROLLER STRUCTURE ANALYSIS...

POSITIVE DETECTION: Implementation utilizes modern C# primary constructor syntax. Route configuration adheres to REST API standards.

backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/MenteeProfile.cs (1)

15-15: MAPPING CONFIGURATION UPDATE DETECTED: ANALYSIS COMPLETE

MAPPING CONFIGURATION SUCCESSFULLY UPDATED TO REFLECT NEW DTO STRUCTURE. NO ANOMALIES DETECTED.

backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Mapper/MentorProfile.cs (1)

15-15: MAPPING CONFIGURATION UPDATE DETECTED: ANALYSIS COMPLETE

MAPPING CONFIGURATION SUCCESSFULLY UPDATED TO REFLECT NEW DTO STRUCTURE. NO ANOMALIES DETECTED.

backend/Modules/Users/MentorConnect.Users.Application/Contracts/IUserServices.cs (2)

15-17: ADD OPERATIONS ANALYSIS: PROCESSING COMPLETE

ADD OPERATIONS SUCCESSFULLY UPDATED TO UTILIZE NEW DTO STRUCTURES. RETURN TYPES PROPERLY CONFIGURED.


20-25: NEW CRUD OPERATIONS DETECTED: ANALYSIS COMPLETE

NEW UPDATE AND DELETE OPERATIONS FOLLOW CONSISTENT PATTERNS. OPERATIONS PROPERLY SEGREGATED BY USER TYPE.

backend/MentorConnect.API/MentorConnect.API.csproj (1)

19-19:

✅ Verification successful

PACKAGE VERSION VERIFICATION REQUIRED

SCANNING PACKAGE VERSION: Swashbuckle.AspNetCore 7.2.0


🌐 Web query:

What is the latest stable version of Swashbuckle.AspNetCore?

💡 Result:

The latest stable version of Swashbuckle.AspNetCore is 7.2.0, released on December 10, 2024[1][3][8]. This version supports:

  • ASP.NET Core >= 2.0
  • Swagger/OpenAPI Specifications:
    • OpenAPI 3.0
    • Swagger 2.0
  • UI Components:
    • swagger-ui v5.x.x
    • ReDoc UI v2.x.x

Key features include automated API documentation generation from ASP.NET Core routes/controllers and integration with swagger-ui for interactive API exploration[1][3]. The package has been downloaded over 4.8 million times since its release[3].

Citations:


VERSION CONFIRMATION: Swashbuckle.AspNetCore 7.2.0 is Up-to-Date

Bleep boop! The package reference in backend/MentorConnect.API/MentorConnect.API.csproj at line 19 correctly specifies version 7.2.0, which is the latest stable release according to the query results. No further action is needed.

Comment on lines +35 to +44
[HttpPut("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<ActionResult> UpdateUser([FromRoute] Guid id, [FromBody] UpdateUserDto user)
{
if (id != user.Id)
{
return BadRequest();
}
await _userServices.UpdateUser(user);
return NoContent();
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

ERROR HANDLING PROTOCOL INCOMPLETE.

UpdateUser requires additional error cases:

  1. Non-existent user scenario not handled
  2. Missing response type attributes
     [HttpPut("{id:guid}")]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status204NoContent)]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound)]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest)]
     public async Task<ActionResult> UpdateUser([FromRoute] Guid id, [FromBody] UpdateUserDto user)
     {
         if (id != user.Id)
         {
             return BadRequest();
         }
-        await _userServices.UpdateUser(user);
+        var exists = await _userServices.GetUserById(id);
+        if (exists == null)
+            return NotFound();
+            
+        await _userServices.UpdateUser(user);
         return NoContent();
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
[HttpPut("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<ActionResult> UpdateUser([FromRoute] Guid id, [FromBody] UpdateUserDto user)
{
if (id != user.Id)
{
return BadRequest();
}
await _userServices.UpdateUser(user);
return NoContent();
}
[HttpPut("{id:guid}")]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status204NoContent)]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound)]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest)]
public async Task<ActionResult> UpdateUser([FromRoute] Guid id, [FromBody] UpdateUserDto user)
{
if (id != user.Id)
{
return BadRequest();
}
var exists = await _userServices.GetUserById(id);
if (exists == null)
return NotFound();
await _userServices.UpdateUser(user);
return NoContent();
}

Comment on lines +13 to +28
[HttpGet]
public async Task<ActionResult<List<GetUserDto>>> GetUsers()
{
return await _userServices.GetAllUsers();
}

[HttpGet("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<ActionResult<GetUserDto>> GetUserById([FromRoute] Guid id)
{
GetUserDto? user = await _userServices.GetUserById(id);
if (user == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return user;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

WARNING: POTENTIAL SCALABILITY CONCERN DETECTED.

GetUsers endpoint lacks pagination mechanism. For optimal performance metrics, consider implementing pagination to prevent potential memory overload with large datasets.

-    public async Task<ActionResult<List<GetUserDto>>> GetUsers()
-    {
-        return await _userServices.GetAllUsers();
-    }
+    public async Task<ActionResult<List<GetUserDto>>> GetUsers([FromQuery] int page = 1, [FromQuery] int pageSize = 10)
+    {
+        return await _userServices.GetPaginatedUsers(page, pageSize);
+    }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
[HttpGet]
public async Task<ActionResult<List<GetUserDto>>> GetUsers()
{
return await _userServices.GetAllUsers();
}
[HttpGet("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<ActionResult<GetUserDto>> GetUserById([FromRoute] Guid id)
{
GetUserDto? user = await _userServices.GetUserById(id);
if (user == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return user;
}
[HttpGet]
public async Task<ActionResult<List<GetUserDto>>> GetUsers([FromQuery] int page = 1, [FromQuery] int pageSize = 10)
{
return await _userServices.GetPaginatedUsers(page, pageSize);
}
[HttpGet("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<ActionResult<GetUserDto>> GetUserById([FromRoute] Guid id)
{
GetUserDto? user = await _userServices.GetUserById(id);
if (user == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return user;
}

Comment on lines +45 to +50
[HttpDelete("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<ActionResult> DeleteUser([FromRoute] Guid id)
{
await _userServices.DeleteUser(id);
return NoContent();
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

ERROR HANDLING PROTOCOL INCOMPLETE.

DeleteUser requires additional error cases:

  1. Non-existent user scenario not handled
  2. Missing response type attributes
     [HttpDelete("{id:guid}")]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status204NoContent)]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound)]
     public async Task<ActionResult> DeleteUser([FromRoute] Guid id)
     {
+        var exists = await _userServices.GetUserById(id);
+        if (exists == null)
+            return NotFound();
+            
         await _userServices.DeleteUser(id);
         return NoContent();
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
[HttpDelete("{id:guid}")]
public async Task<ActionResult> DeleteUser([FromRoute] Guid id)
{
await _userServices.DeleteUser(id);
return NoContent();
}
[HttpDelete("{id:guid}")]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status204NoContent)]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound)]
public async Task<ActionResult> DeleteUser([FromRoute] Guid id)
{
var exists = await _userServices.GetUserById(id);
if (exists == null)
return NotFound();
await _userServices.DeleteUser(id);
return NoContent();
}

Comment on lines +29 to +34
[HttpPost]
public async Task<ActionResult<GetUserDto>> AddUser([FromBody] CreateUserDto user)
{
var result = await _userServices.AddUser(user);
return result;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

DETECTED: NON-OPTIMAL REST IMPLEMENTATION.

POST endpoint requires optimization:

  1. Missing CreatedAtAction result for proper 201 response
  2. Input validation attributes not detected
     [HttpPost]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status201Created)]
+    [ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest)]
     public async Task<ActionResult<GetUserDto>> AddUser([FromBody] CreateUserDto user)
     {
         var result = await _userServices.AddUser(user);
-        return result;
+        return CreatedAtAction(nameof(GetUserById), new { id = result.Id }, result);
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
[HttpPost]
public async Task<ActionResult<GetUserDto>> AddUser([FromBody] CreateUserDto user)
{
var result = await _userServices.AddUser(user);
return result;
}
[HttpPost]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status201Created)]
[ProducesResponseType(StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest)]
public async Task<ActionResult<GetUserDto>> AddUser([FromBody] CreateUserDto user)
{
var result = await _userServices.AddUser(user);
return CreatedAtAction(nameof(GetUserById), new { id = result.Id }, result);
}

Comment on lines 12 to +15
CreateMap<Admin, GetAdminDto>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.User, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.User));
CreateMap<Admin, AdminDto>();
CreateMap<CreateAdminDto, Admin>();
CreateMap<CreateUpdateAdminDto, Admin>();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

BEEP BOOP: ANALYZING MAPPING CONFIGURATION

MAPPING ANALYSIS COMPLETE. CONFIGURATION APPEARS FUNCTIONAL BUT COULD BE ENHANCED.

RECOMMENDED ENHANCEMENTS:

CreateMap<CreateUpdateAdminDto, Admin>()
    .ForMember(dest => dest.Id, opt => opt
        .MapFrom(src => src.Id ?? Guid.NewGuid()))  // Handle null Id for create
    .ForAllMembers(opts => opts
        .Condition((src, dest, srcMember) => srcMember != null));  // Ignore nulls during update

EXPLANATION: ENHANCED MAPPING WILL:

  • GENERATE NEW ID FOR CREATE OPERATIONS
  • IGNORE NULL VALUES DURING UPDATES

Comment on lines +35 to +43
public async Task<ActionResult> UpdateMentee([FromRoute] Guid id, [FromBody] CreateUpdateMenteeDto mentee)
{
if (id != mentee.Id)
{
return BadRequest();
}
await _userServices.UpdateMentee(mentee);
return NoContent();
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

EXISTENCE CHECK REQUIRED

ALERT! UPDATE and DELETE operations should verify resource existence.

     public async Task<ActionResult> UpdateMentee([FromRoute] Guid id, [FromBody] CreateUpdateMenteeDto mentee)
     {
         if (id != mentee.Id)
         {
             return BadRequest();
         }
+        var existingMentee = await _userServices.GetMenteeById(id);
+        if (existingMentee == null)
+            return NotFound();
         await _userServices.UpdateMentee(mentee);
         return NoContent();
     }

     public async Task<ActionResult> DeleteMentee([FromRoute] Guid id)
     {
+        var existingMentee = await _userServices.GetMenteeById(id);
+        if (existingMentee == null)
+            return NotFound();
         await _userServices.DeleteMentee(id);
         return NoContent();
     }

Also applies to: 44-49

Comment on lines +29 to +33
public async Task<ActionResult<GetMenteeDto>> AddMentee([FromBody] CreateUpdateMenteeDto mentee)
{
var result = await _userServices.AddMentee(mentee);
return result;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

MISSING CREATED RESPONSE

PROCESSING ERROR: POST endpoint should return CreatedAtAction with location header.

-        var result = await _userServices.AddMentee(mentee);
-        return result;
+        var result = await _userServices.AddMentee(mentee);
+        return CreatedAtAction(nameof(GetMenteeById), new { id = result.Id }, result);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public async Task<ActionResult<GetMenteeDto>> AddMentee([FromBody] CreateUpdateMenteeDto mentee)
{
var result = await _userServices.AddMentee(mentee);
return result;
}
public async Task<ActionResult<GetMenteeDto>> AddMentee([FromBody] CreateUpdateMenteeDto mentee)
{
var result = await _userServices.AddMentee(mentee);
return CreatedAtAction(nameof(GetMenteeById), new { id = result.Id }, result);
}

Comment on lines +20 to +26
var allMentees = await _userServices.GetAllMentees();
var result = allMentees.FirstOrDefault(mentee => mentee.Id == id);
if (result == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return result;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

PERFORMANCE ALERT: INEFFICIENT QUERY DETECTED

BEEP BOOP! Current implementation retrieves all mentees to find one. Suboptimal for large datasets.

Recommended optimization:

-        var allMentees = await _userServices.GetAllMentees();
-        var result = allMentees.FirstOrDefault(mentee => mentee.Id == id);
+        var result = await _userServices.GetMenteeById(id);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
var allMentees = await _userServices.GetAllMentees();
var result = allMentees.FirstOrDefault(mentee => mentee.Id == id);
if (result == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return result;
var result = await _userServices.GetMenteeById(id);
if (result == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return result;

Comment on lines +116 to +144
public Task UpdateAdmin(CreateUpdateAdminDto adminInfo)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}

public Task DeleteAdmin(Guid id)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}

public Task UpdateMentor(CreateUpdateMentorDto mentorInfo)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}

public Task DeleteMentor(Guid id)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}

public Task UpdateMentee(CreateUpdateMenteeDto menteeInfo)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}

public Task DeleteMentee(Guid id)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

⚠️ Potential issue

UNIMPLEMENTED METHODS DETECTED

ALERT! Multiple methods throwing NotImplementedException. Implementation required before deployment:

  • UpdateAdmin
  • DeleteAdmin
  • UpdateMentor
  • DeleteMentor
  • UpdateMentee
  • DeleteMentee

BEEP BOOP! Would you like me to generate implementations for these methods?

Comment on lines +88 to 95
public async Task<GetMentorDto> AddMentor(CreateUpdateMentorDto mentorInfo)
{
var mentor = _mapper.Map<Admin>(mentorInfo);
mentor.CreateTime();
await _userRepository.AddAdminAsync(mentor);
var result = _mapper.Map<GetMentorDto>(mentor);
return result;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

CRITICAL: INCORRECT ENTITY MAPPING

ERROR! CRITICAL! Mentor is being mapped to Admin entity.

-        var mentor = _mapper.Map<Admin>(mentorInfo);
+        var mentor = _mapper.Map<Mentor>(mentorInfo);
         mentor.CreateTime();
-        await _userRepository.AddAdminAsync(mentor);
+        await _userRepository.AddMentorAsync(mentor);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public async Task<GetMentorDto> AddMentor(CreateUpdateMentorDto mentorInfo)
{
var mentor = _mapper.Map<Admin>(mentorInfo);
mentor.CreateTime();
await _userRepository.AddAdminAsync(mentor);
var result = _mapper.Map<GetMentorDto>(mentor);
return result;
}
public async Task<GetMentorDto> AddMentor(CreateUpdateMentorDto mentorInfo)
{
- var mentor = _mapper.Map<Admin>(mentorInfo);
+ var mentor = _mapper.Map<Mentor>(mentorInfo);
mentor.CreateTime();
- await _userRepository.AddAdminAsync(mentor);
+ await _userRepository.AddMentorAsync(mentor);
var result = _mapper.Map<GetMentorDto>(mentor);
return result;
}

@SaiemAziz SaiemAziz merged commit 4584cca into main Feb 22, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants