Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: allow plugins to be scoped to multiple entities when on consumer… #33

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

GGabriele
Copy link
Collaborator

…-groups

Summary

SUMMARY_GOES_HERE

Full changelog

  • [Implement ...]
  • [Fix ...]

Issues resolved

Fix #XXX

Documentation

Testing

  • Unit tests
  • E2E tests
  • Manual testing on Universal
  • Manual testing on Kubernetes

@GGabriele GGabriele force-pushed the fix/plugin-scoping-to-cg-and-more branch 2 times, most recently from 1f1263c to dcb47dd Compare January 5, 2024 13:32
@GGabriele GGabriele marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 14:19
@GGabriele GGabriele requested a review from a team January 5, 2024 14:19
@GGabriele GGabriele force-pushed the fix/plugin-scoping-to-cg-and-more branch from dcb47dd to fff94b2 Compare January 5, 2024 14:27
@GGabriele GGabriele force-pushed the fix/plugin-scoping-to-cg-and-more branch from fff94b2 to 174073c Compare January 5, 2024 14:34
Copy link
Contributor

@rainest rainest left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The keepalive_pool_size changes look a bit 🤔 given that it's apparently not a schema violation and we're not actually using Redis in those configs, but I suppose the rest looks fine and changing (unused) test config can't obviously hurt anything 🤷

Is that somehow necessary for 3.4+ compatibility?

@rainest rainest enabled auto-merge (squash) January 12, 2024 23:19
@rainest rainest merged commit 3c360b8 into main Jan 12, 2024
39 checks passed
@rainest rainest deleted the fix/plugin-scoping-to-cg-and-more branch January 12, 2024 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants