Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add
iszero(x)
branches toxlogy
andxlog1py
#54Add
iszero(x)
branches toxlogy
andxlog1py
#54Changes from all commits
b3eff55
b4d8cf5
50de614
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if these should be added, even if it makes the rule match finite differencing. NaN is usually not very useful as it infects everything. So eg the forward rule will always yield NaN for any of these conditions. See eg https://juliadiff.org/ChainRulesCore.jl/stable/maths/nondiff_points.html.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit mysterious to me. On the (seemingly equivalent) branches in the rrule for logpdf of NegativeBinomial we wanted NaN. Was this something specific to Distributions.jl?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy to change this but I'm unsure about the discrepancy to Distributions.jl