You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the ADL charge drift model is usually constructed from a configuration file.
I think it would be nice to also have a constructor function for it,
which takes all the parameters, e100μ0 ..., as keyword arguments
(defaults would be the values from the ADL paper(s) which we can update once we have better ones).
The current method taking the configuration-file (dictionary) as input should than just pass the values to that keyword constructor method.
Same for the temperature model constructors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now the ADL charge drift model is usually constructed from a configuration file.
I think it would be nice to also have a constructor function for it,
which takes all the parameters,
e100μ0
..., as keyword arguments(defaults would be the values from the ADL paper(s) which we can update once we have better ones).
The current method taking the configuration-file (dictionary) as input should than just pass the values to that keyword constructor method.
Same for the temperature model constructors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: