Qualify sweeping claim about the Julia Forem #1981
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Once the build has completed, you can preview your PR at this URL: https://julialang.netlify.app/previews/PR1981/ in ~15 minutes |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
"the best place for the community to read, write, and share written content." is an incredibly strong claim. Too strong, IMO.
I've qualified it to refer to long form content as Zulip may be better for informal short form written content and Discourse may be better for short and medium length written content (if only due to higher user base).
As an alternative, we could weaken it to "a good place for the community to read, write, and share written content."