Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

generalize backtrace test to succeed without inlining #13698

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2015
Merged

generalize backtrace test to succeed without inlining #13698

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2015

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Oct 20, 2015

No description provided.

@kshyatt kshyatt added test This change adds or pertains to unit tests regression Regression in behavior compared to a previous version labels Oct 21, 2015
vtjnash added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2015
@vtjnash
Merge pull request #13698 from JuliaLang/jn/fix-coverage
725cfe2 
generalize backtrace test to succeed without inlining
@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit 725cfe2 into master Oct 21, 2015
@vtjnash vtjnash deleted the jn/fix-coverage branch October 21, 2015 01:35
tkelman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2016
@vtjnash @tkelman
generalize backtrace test to succeed without inlining
e5701a5 
(cherry picked from commit 249c91a)
ref #13698
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
regression Regression in behavior compared to a previous version test This change adds or pertains to unit tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@vtjnash @kshyatt