Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Composite Bundle #216
Remove Composite Bundle #216
Changes from 7 commits
7c0641c
be091aa
c205e34
cf137a0
13762e7
f4f996d
50383b6
bfd99c2
121ec20
b257eeb
b9f74ce
34cedf8
9794666
ba5841e
40da34b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my problem with this is I don;t think that
b_partials
length1<<(N+1)-1
because it has length
N
and those are never equal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference as a part way step to determining this , I first refactored the CompositeBundle version into
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this shouldn't be needed as we already have cases for
TaylorBundle
above.Likewise several others of this kind below will not be needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this check is just wrong AFAICT.
because if the primal is a TangentBundle, then the first derivative is a
Tangent{TangentBundle}
The first deriviative has no primal component.
But this was never hit before because we were not making
TaylorBundles
when taking derivatives of TaylorBundles, (at least not in anything that happens in ourtest/forward.jl
I checked) we were (I assume) makingCompositeBundles
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this second derivative is actually broken on main
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we know what change broke it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this second derivative is actually broken on main