Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fixed inline commands for remote changes group #568

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2019

Conversation

edgardmessias
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #568 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #568      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.72%   57.69%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         110      110              
  Lines        4099     4099              
  Branches      583      593      +10     
==========================================
- Hits         2366     2365       -1     
  Misses       1521     1521              
- Partials      212      213       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/repository.ts 60.65% <0%> (-0.22%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6a8a85b...f52fd10. Read the comment docs.

@JohnstonCode JohnstonCode merged commit 8940f6f into JohnstonCode:master May 10, 2019
JohnstonCode added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2019
## [1.48.2](v1.48.1...v1.48.2) (2019-05-10)

### Bug Fixes

* Fixed inline commands for remote changes group ([#568](#568)) ([8940f6f](8940f6f))
@JohnstonCode
Copy link
Owner

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.48.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@edgardmessias edgardmessias deleted the remotechanges branch June 3, 2019 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants