-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ➜ and = signs instead of READ and WRITE in representations tests #458
Conversation
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ import java.lang.reflect.* | |||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException | |||
import java.util.* | |||
import kotlin.coroutines.intrinsics.COROUTINE_SUSPENDED | |||
import kotlin.jvm.javaClass |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this change necessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
removed
} | ||
append("READ") | ||
append(": $valueRepresentation") | ||
append(" ⟶") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please use "→" instead
append(valueRepresentation) | ||
append(")") | ||
append("") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you need to append nothing?
append("READ") | ||
append(": $valueRepresentation") | ||
append(" ➜") | ||
append(" $valueRepresentation") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's combine these two append
-s
| Thread 1 | | ||
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ||
| operation() | | ||
| atomicReference1 ⟶ AtomicReference#1 at AtomicReferencesFromMultipleFieldsTest.operation(AtomicReferencesNamesTests.kt:97) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please update the outputs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
they are updated
it is just on github both arrow types look identical, I guess
No description provided.