Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Markdown link focus #608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024
Merged

Fix Markdown link focus #608

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

rock3r
Copy link
Collaborator

@rock3r rock3r commented Sep 23, 2024

In #598, for some reason, a drawStyle = Stroke(2f) was added to the bridge focused link style, causing rendering of focused links to look weird in the bridge. This fixes the issue, and also makes sure the pressed links are also underlined, matching Swing's behaviour.

Fixes #607

In #598, for some reason a drawStyle = Stroke(2f) was added to the
bridge focused link style, causing rendering of focused links to look
weird in the bridge. This fixes the issue, and also makes sure the
pressed links are also underlined, matching Swing's behaviour.
@rock3r rock3r requested a review from hamen September 23, 2024 16:51
@rock3r rock3r self-assigned this Sep 23, 2024
@rock3r rock3r enabled auto-merge (squash) September 23, 2024 16:52
@rock3r rock3r merged commit 44c0d60 into main Sep 23, 2024
1 check passed
@rock3r rock3r deleted the fix-markdown-link-focus branch September 23, 2024 16:57
rock3r added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
In #598, for some reason a drawStyle = Stroke(2f) was added to the
bridge focused link style, causing rendering of focused links to look
weird in the bridge. This fixes the issue, and also makes sure the
pressed links are also underlined, matching Swing's behaviour.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Markdown links look weird when focused
2 participants