Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: VSDSPUB-349: Add Gone status to soft deleted fragments #300

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Nov 17, 2022

Conversation

WLefever-Cegeka
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka force-pushed the feature/VSDSPUB-349-gone-http-status branch from 9a48041 to 2e768c1 Compare November 15, 2022 12:32
@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka force-pushed the feature/VSDSPUB-349-parent-updater-impl branch 7 times, most recently from 558c8d6 to 7c02842 Compare November 17, 2022 11:15
@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka force-pushed the feature/VSDSPUB-349-gone-http-status branch 2 times, most recently from 766eedd to adf29cb Compare November 17, 2022 11:22
Base automatically changed from feature/VSDSPUB-349-parent-updater-impl to main November 17, 2022 11:23
@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka force-pushed the feature/VSDSPUB-349-gone-http-status branch 4 times, most recently from 93c668a to 096003d Compare November 17, 2022 11:33
@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka force-pushed the feature/VSDSPUB-349-gone-http-status branch from 096003d to 4ac3880 Compare November 17, 2022 11:37
@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2022 11:37
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

85.0% 85.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka merged commit 6827536 into main Nov 17, 2022
@WLefever-Cegeka WLefever-Cegeka deleted the feature/VSDSPUB-349-gone-http-status branch November 17, 2022 11:41
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Optional<LdesFragment> retrieveMutableFragment(String viewName,

Optional<LdesFragment> retrieveRootFragment(String viewName);

Stream<LdesFragment> retrieveImmutableFragmentsOfView(String viewName);
Stream<LdesFragment> retrieveNonDeletedImmutableFragmentsOfView(String viewName);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got to say I find this rename more confusing.. I'd keep it at retrieveImmutableFragmentsOfView

WLefever-Cegeka added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants