-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 504
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add CodeQL Github Action #9252
add CodeQL Github Action #9252
Conversation
If you are still interested in this PR, can you please merge and resolve any merge conflicts with the latest from develop? If so, we can prioritize reviewing and QAing the changes. If we don’t hear from you by May 22, 2024, we’ll go ahead and close this PR (it can always be reopened after that date, if there is still interest). |
Rebased onto |
Hooray for code quality tools integration! I hope this PR will be merged, and/or #9847. (I'm not really involved, but have been a proponent of cleaning up the code base for years.) However, https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/actions/runs/8842621992 says that the autobuild failed and to update the used actions. Could you have a look at the suggestions? |
2024/11/18: @ofahimIQSS please review and decide how we can move it forward. Thanks! |
I’m currently researching the potential benefits of integrating CodeQL into our GitHub Actions workflow. CodeQL is a robust security and code analysis tool designed to identify vulnerabilities and maintain high-quality code standards. Over the next few weeks, I’ll analyze how CodeQL compares to other similar tools, evaluating its impact on our development process, code quality, and overall team efficiency. |
@carlsonp any idea why this PR is failing? 🤔 ![]() |
Guessing it's the out of date actions - at QDR we have https://github.com/QualitativeDataRepository/dataverse/blob/develop/.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml which has new versions of all the github actions involved. We also have Java, JavaScript and Python as languages, versus just Java. |
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
I went through the wizard at https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/new/develop?filename=.github%2Fworkflows%2Fcodeql.yml&workflow_template=code-scanning%2Fcodeql and then copied and pasted it into the YAML for this PR in 793c3ee. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this is ready to merge now.
Im wondering how we can handle/proceed with the code scanning results: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/security/code-scanning?page=1&query=pr%3A9252+tool%3ACodeQL+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-desc |
Noticed that continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-merge failed - rerunning it now. |
The branch was 3231 commits behind. 😅 I just merged the latest from develop into it. |
Looks good, merging PR |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds a Github Action for CodeQL. It integrates well since it's from Github. It helps in checking for security vulnerabilities.
Will be a no-op for code and documentation.
Which issue(s) this PR closes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Suggestions on how to test this:
Does this PR introduce a user interface change? If mockups are available, please link/include them here:
Is there a release notes update needed for this change?:
Additional documentation: