Abandonment process for old TI supplements

[JohnMoehrke]

1. find some TI supplements that are potential candidates to deprecate
2. Send notification to membership indicating that we are going to abandon them without someone coming forward to support the continued TI or promotion to FT
3. If no advocate comes forward, then we deprecate.

[JohnMoehrke]

should pick up in the spring

[kevino7]

Definitely good to record a rationale for deprecation.
Should harmonize with the existing process: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Evaluation_of_Published_Profiles
If needed can expand the deprecation reasons to include "Boredom/Apathy" :-)

[JohnMoehrke]

We do use that process. This item is not to write a process, it is to execute the existing process across the portfolio. John Moehrke - Architect: Standards - Interoperability, Privacy, and Security for Bylight.com https://healthcaresecprivacy.blogspot.com

…

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 12:38 PM kevino7 ***@***.***> wrote: Definitely good to record a rationale for deprecation. Should harmonize with the existing process: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Evaluation_of_Published_Profiles If needed can expand the deprecation reasons to include "Boredom/Apathy" :-) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#170 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHBWC5ZMVVWLNY5XNKAHFLDVQCT7ZANCNFSM5CKGYNTQ> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>