Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Internal type parameter changes #11436

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023
Merged

Internal type parameter changes #11436

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

Simn
Copy link
Member

@Simn Simn commented Dec 19, 2023

I don't wanna talk about it.

@Simn
Copy link
Member Author

Simn commented Dec 19, 2023

CI is green and there are more removals than additions, which in my world is pretty much an auto-merge!

There's a chance that this unearths some problems due to the lazy usage for constraints. If anyone comes across an CamlinternalLazy.Undefined exception, please remain calm and let me know!

@Simn Simn merged commit 541259e into development Dec 19, 2023
@Simn Simn deleted the apply_params_physeq branch December 19, 2023 18:47
@skial skial mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2023
1 task
kLabz pushed a commit to kLabz/haxe that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2023
* use tclass equality instead of Type.t

* change type parameter handling

* fix gencommon a bit

* remove redundant name

* fix gencommon param cloning

* make sure lazies are resolved at some point
kLabz pushed a commit to kLabz/haxe that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2023
* use tclass equality instead of Type.t

* change type parameter handling

* fix gencommon a bit

* remove redundant name

* fix gencommon param cloning

* make sure lazies are resolved at some point
0b1kn00b pushed a commit to 0b1kn00b/haxe that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
* use tclass equality instead of Type.t

* change type parameter handling

* fix gencommon a bit

* remove redundant name

* fix gencommon param cloning

* make sure lazies are resolved at some point
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant