Update README.md

[guibranco]

No description provided.

[korbit-ai]

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

1. Ensure consistency in badge styles and formatting for a professional appearance.
2. Consider integrating badges with relevant information related to the project for improved clarity.
3. Optimize badge placement within the README for better visual organization and user experience.

The description could be more helpful.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[codara-ai-code-review]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. README.md:
   • The badge for "Deploy via ftp" has been removed without an explanation. It might be relevant to users or contributors to know if the deployment method has changed.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. README.md:
   • Consider adding a brief description or tooltip to the "Build" and "Linting" badges to provide more context to users. This can enhance user experience and understanding.
   • Ensure consistency in the naming of the badges. It's good practice to have a standardized naming convention for badges to maintain clarity and organization within the README file.

[gooroo-dev]

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Summary of Proposed Changes

• 🛠️ Changed the badge labels for build and linting workflows in the README.md file:
  • ✅ Updated "Deploy via ftp" to "Build".
  • ✅ Updated "PHP Linting" to "Linting".

Identified Issues

No issues were found in the proposed changes.

General Review

The proposed changes are straightforward and involve updating the labels of badges in the README.md file to more accurately reflect their purpose. The changes improve clarity and do not introduce any mistakes, typos, security issues, performance concerns, or readability issues. The code quality and style are maintained appropriately.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
React or reply to share your thoughts!

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ababd0c and 0784e6b.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[senior-dev-bot]

Feedback from Senior Dev Bot

[senior-dev-bot]

CODE REVIEW

Good changes to simplify badge labels. Here are some suggestions:

1. Standardize Badge Names:
   Ensure badge names are consistent and meaningful.

2. Reorder for Clearer Readability:
   Consider reordering to group by action or intent.

Example:

[![CodeFactor](https://www.codefactor.io/repository/github/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent/badge)](https://www.codefactor.io/repository/github/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent)
[![License](https://img.shields.io/github/license/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent)](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent)
[![Last Commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent)](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent)
[![Build](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent/actions/workflows/build.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent/actions/workflows/build.yml)
[![Linting](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent/actions/workflows/linter.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-dotnet-ExtractPdfContent/actions/workflows/linter.yml)

[korbit-ai]

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!

---

Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

10:56AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:56AM INF 89 commits scanned.
10:56AM INF scan completed in 67.5ms
10:56AM INF no leaks found

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud