-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tlsEarlyData support to TargetHttpsProxy. #10954
Conversation
Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run. @NickElliot, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 8 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccComputeInstanceNetworkIntefaceWithSecurityPolicy|TestAccComputeManagedSslCertificate_managedSslCertificateBasicExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_certificateMap|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyBasicExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyCertificateManagerCertificateExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyHttpKeepAliveTimeoutExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyMtlsExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_update |
mmv1/third_party/tgc/tests/data/example_compute_target_https_proxy.json.
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccComputeInstanceNetworkIntefaceWithSecurityPolicy |
|
@NickElliot This PR has been waiting for review for 3 weekdays. Please take a look! Use the label |
/gcbrun |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccComputeInstanceNetworkIntefaceWithSecurityPolicy |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
test failure is unrelated and persistent in nightly -- LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait realized one thing, sorry about that
- :STRICT | ||
- :PERMISSIVE | ||
- :DISABLED | ||
default_value: :DISABLED |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
adding a new default value can be very undesired due to potential risk to user configs -- does this field have a server side default? if so it could be flagged as default_from_api: true
with the default removed. otherwise, we should remove the default value entirely as the field is optional.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack, I can confirm that the server side default is automatically set to DISABLED. Using default_from_api: true
makes sense here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you both! Changed to default_from_api: true
.
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 8 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccComputeInstanceNetworkIntefaceWithSecurityPolicy|TestAccComputeManagedSslCertificate_managedSslCertificateBasicExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_certificateMap|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyBasicExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyCertificateManagerCertificateExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyHttpKeepAliveTimeoutExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_targetHttpsProxyMtlsExample|TestAccComputeTargetHttpsProxy_update |
|
mmv1/third_party/tgc/tests/data/example_compute_target_https_proxy.json.
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccComputeInstanceNetworkIntefaceWithSecurityPolicy |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM :)
Thank you, @NickElliot ! |
Fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#18421
Tests that I run:
Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)