Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
report: source-location for linkifying #9354
report: source-location for linkifying #9354
Changes from 10 commits
ba10b4d
4b139e5
dd1a015
771f4d2
35ee4a8
1aff81c
d2f5901
2b7c535
d958a06
b60ac0c
1d6e180
48fc734
55351b2
a27662a
e9ba60b
320b28f
a3fe3e9
06ebc59
87ef6c8
193a01f
fe3ded1
51a8261
87813ce
1fb1c60
ddec94d
a3bb066
d04bc12
8036b81
6cdfa33
1062f41
e97891f
8cca543
9ecc815
634a295
8bf0153
5abf748
cf4eef2
c7cbd2a
bf819d2
6bb5007
4af5aad
c29e9cb
9295fc0
b879e84
75ef6ba
1e9abab
c1aa17a
cd66b45
aec3484
a16756e
d2c6b60
7c28493
a62e34c
eae758c
30a7daf
f9de084
f75e251
96c7d3e
a8c5655
386a654
b26d9c0
2274114
6f38744
56eb6c0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think .toString() is a little favored over using the constructor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fyi this file uses
String()
a few times but nevertoString
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, I don't know how that happened in here but generally good to stick with the ambient style
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed to toString()
note, if a plugin happens to provide a bad value (or no value) here, it would now error the renderer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I was agreeing with you that String() is fine in here since it's the established style
(there's only so much we can do against a plugin that refuses to use our types, though. you don't even need a plugin, you could just save a bad lhr to a gist and load it in the viewer)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops, reverted.