Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
227: Save (and restore) number of sources and first source ID in presets #229
227: Save (and restore) number of sources and first source ID in presets #229
Changes from 5 commits
bf277da
3867481
b884afd
e1031ad
039606c
ba93032
26a76b1
dff62e3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
est-ce qu'on est surs que ça change rien ? ça peut avoir un impact si le type est "plain-old-data".
ex.: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/nzqbPvvv8
ici on voit que dans le premier cas en haut, la mémoire est renvoyée directement de la fonction; dans le second cas elle se fait zeroed avant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh wow ok, bien vu!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
j'ai l'impression qu'il y a pas mal de petits changements de formatting qui inviteraient à faire une MR globale de clang-format, qu'en penses-tu ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(à noter qu'il faut vraiment la faire à un moment ou tout est mergé et il n'y a rien d'autre en cours sinon ça va être l'enfer)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
haha ouais 💯
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pas sûr qu'on veuille garder ces commentaires dans la version finale ^^'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
kinda makes sense, a lot of spatialization systems work like this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this method can be marked const
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hopefully one day juce supports std::format :D with it it would be:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right... another thing is we'd need to change the c++ version in the projucer. I'll make a note of it