Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump prettier from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 in /flowauth/frontend #6884

Merged

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 5, 2024

Bumps prettier from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2.

Release notes

Sourced from prettier's releases.

3.4.2

🔗 Changelog

Changelog

Sourced from prettier's changelog.

3.4.2

diff

Treat U+30A0 & U+30FB in Katakana Block as CJK (#16796 by @​tats-u)

Prettier doesn't treat U+30A0 & U+30FB as Japanese. U+30FB is commonly used in Japanese to represent the delimitation of first and last names of non-Japanese people or “and”. The following “C言語・C++・Go・Rust” means “C language & C++ & Go & Rust” in Japanese.

<!-- Input (--prose-wrap=never) -->
C言
語
・
C++
・
Go
・
Rust
<!-- Prettier 3.4.1 -->
C言語・ C++ ・ Go ・ Rust
<!-- Prettier 3.4.2 -->
C言語・C++・Go・Rust

U+30A0 can be used as the replacement of the - in non-Japanese names (e.g. “Saint-Saëns” (Charles Camille Saint-Saëns) can be represented as “サン゠サーンス” in Japanese), but substituted by ASCII hyphen (U+002D) or U+FF1D (full width hyphen) in many cases (e.g. “サン=サーンス” or “サン=サーンス”).

Fix comments print on class methods with decorators (#16891 by @​fisker)

// Input
class A {
  @decorator
  /** 
   * The method description
   *
  */
  async method(foo: Foo, bar: Bar) {
    console.log(foo);
  }
}
// Prettier 3.4.1
class A {
@​decorator
async /**
</tr></table>

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added the FlowAuth Issues related to FlowAuth label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: This PR updates the prettier dependency from version 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 in the flowauth/frontend directory. This update ensures that the project benefits from the latest bug fixes and improvements, maintaining code quality and developer productivity.
  • Key components modified: The package.json and package-lock.json files are modified to reflect the updated dependency version.
  • Impact assessment: The update primarily affects the code formatting and linting processes. There are no direct impacts on other components, but developers should ensure that the new version of Prettier does not introduce any formatting issues.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: The integration points remain unaffected as this is a minor version update. The dependency update from prettier 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 introduces minor improvements and bug fixes, which should not impact the overall system architecture.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: No significant changes to the system design.
  • Component interactions: The update does not alter how components interact within the system.
  • Integration points: The integration points remain unaffected as this is a minor version update.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

[flowauth/frontend/package.json] - [devDependencies]

  • Submitted PR Code:
    ---
    +++
    @@ -24,21 +24,21 @@
         "build": "react-scripts build",
         "test": "cypress run",
         "eject": "react-scripts eject",
         "cy:open": "cypress open",
         "cy:verify": "cypress verify"
       },
       "devDependencies": {
         "cypress": "^13.16.0",
         "husky": "^9.1.4",
         "otp-cli": "^0.2.0",
    -    "prettier": "^3.4.1",
    +    "prettier": "^3.4.2",
         "pretty-quick": "^3.1.3",
         "jest": "^29.7.0"
       },
       "browserslist": [
         ">0.2%",
         "not dead",
         "not ie <= 11",
         "not op_mini all"
       ],
       "husky": {
  • Analysis:
    • Current logic and potential issues: The update to Prettier 3.4.2 introduces changes in how certain Unicode characters are treated, specifically U+30A0 and U+30FB, which are now considered CJK characters. This change can affect the formatting of Japanese text and names, potentially leading to unintended formatting issues in the codebase.
    • Edge cases and error handling: Developers need to be aware of the new formatting rules for Japanese text. Edge cases include scenarios where Japanese names or delimiters are used in comments or strings. There might be unexpected formatting changes that could affect readability or correctness.
    • **Cross-component impact **: The impact is limited to the formatting of the codebase. However, if the codebase includes Japanese text or names, there could be formatting inconsistencies that affect readability.
    • **Business logic considerations **: This update does not directly affect business logic but can impact the maintainability and readability of the codebase, especially for teams that include Japanese text in their code or documentation.
  • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
    {
      "scripts": {
        "format:check": "prettier --check .",
        "format:fix": "prettier --write ."
      }
    }
  • **Improvement rationale **:
    • Technical benefits: Adding scripts to check and fix Prettier formatting issues ensures that the codebase adheres to the new formatting rules introduced in Prettier 3.4.2. This helps in maintaining consistency and catching any formatting issues early.
    • Business value: Maintaining a consistent code style improves code readability and maintainability, which is crucial for collaborative development. Ensuring that Japanese text is correctly formatted is particularly important for teams with multilingual codebases.
    • Risk assessment: The risk of introducing formatting issues is mitigated by running Prettier checks and fixes as part of the CI pipeline. This ensures that any formatting changes are caught and addressed promptly, reducing the likelihood of merge conflicts or readability issues.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues:

    • Issue description: None identified.
    • Impact: N/A
    • Recommendation: N/A
  • 🟡 Warnings:

    • Warning description: Ensure that the updated Prettier version does not introduce any formatting issues in the codebase.
    • Potential risks:
      • Potential formatting issues may arise due to the new version's handling of specific Unicode characters.
      • Maintenance overhead if formatting issues are not caught early.
    • Suggested improvements:
      • Run Prettier on the entire codebase to identify and fix any formatting issues introduced by the update.
      • Ensure that the CI pipeline includes a step to check for Prettier formatting issues.

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects: The update improves maintainability by keeping the tooling up-to-date.
  • Readability issues: There are no specific readability issues related to this update.
  • Performance bottlenecks: The performance impact is negligible as this update affects only the code formatting tool.

4. Security Assessment

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: No security concerns related to this update.
  • Data handling concerns: No data handling concerns related to this update.
  • Input validation: No input validation concerns related to this update.
  • Security best practices: No security best practices concerns related to this update.
  • Potential security risks: No potential security risks related to this update.
  • Mitigation strategies: No mitigation strategies required for this update.
  • Security testing requirements: No security testing requirements related to this update.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis: Ensure that the CI pipeline includes tests to check for Prettier formatting issues.
  • Integration test requirements: Validate that the updated Prettier version does not introduce any formatting regressions.
  • Edge cases coverage: No specific edge cases coverage required for this update.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

{
  "scripts": {
    "format:check": "prettier --check .",
    "format:fix": "prettier --write ."
  }
}
  • Coverage improvements: Ensure that the codebase adheres to the new formatting rules introduced in Prettier 3.4.2.
  • Performance testing needs: No performance testing needs related to this update.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed (API, architecture, configuration): Update the project's documentation to reflect the new Prettier version and any changes in formatting rules.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that all developers are aware of the update and any potential impacts on their workflow.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements: No technical debt or monitoring requirements related to this update.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy: No deployment impact or strategy changes related to this update.
  • Key operational considerations: No key operational considerations related to this update.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Important improvements suggested:
    • Run Prettier on the entire codebase to identify and fix any formatting issues introduced by the update.
    • Ensure that the CI pipeline includes a step to check for Prettier formatting issues.
  2. Best practices to implement:
    • Add scripts to check and fix Prettier formatting issues to maintain consistency and catch any formatting issues early.
  3. Cross-cutting concerns to address:
    • Ensure that the codebase adheres to the new formatting rules introduced in Prettier 3.4.2, especially for teams with multilingual codebases.

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path: Continue to keep dependencies up-to-date to benefit from the latest bug fixes and improvements.
  • Business capability evolution: Maintaining a consistent code style improves code readability and maintainability, which is crucial for collaborative development.
  • System integration impacts: No system integration impacts related to this update.

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 5, 2024

FlowAuth    Run #24106

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #24106  •  git commit 10fd32891f: Bump prettier from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 in /flowauth/frontend
Project FlowAuth
Branch Review dependabot-npm_and_yarn-flowauth-frontend-prettier-3.4.2
Run status status check passed Passed #24106
Run duration 00m 55s
Commit git commit 10fd32891f: Bump prettier from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 in /flowauth/frontend
Committer dependabot[bot]
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 4
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Bumps [prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/prettier/prettier/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/prettier/prettier/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](prettier/prettier@3.4.1...3.4.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: prettier
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot-npm_and_yarn-flowauth-frontend-prettier-3.4.2 branch from 13ec391 to 10fd328 Compare December 18, 2024 05:08
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.16%. Comparing base (71f0acd) to head (10fd328).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6884   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.16%   92.16%           
=======================================
  Files         276      276           
  Lines       10761    10761           
  Branches     1298     1298           
=======================================
  Hits         9918     9918           
  Misses        690      690           
  Partials      153      153           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2e9ba5c into master Dec 18, 2024
40 of 41 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the dependabot-npm_and_yarn-flowauth-frontend-prettier-3.4.2 branch December 18, 2024 05:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FlowAuth Issues related to FlowAuth
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants