[Internal QA]: Update web behaviour of bank connection for card assign #55561

waterim · 2025-01-21T19:25:30Z

Details

MOBILE-EXPENSIFY:13370

Fixed Issues

$ #55104
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Precondition: Credential status in expired condition for assigning cards

Navigate to members section of a Workspace where company cards are enabled and added
Select a member and click + new card
Select Card and click Next

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

None

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Expensify_assign_card.mov

melvin-bot · 2025-01-21T19:25:37Z

@thesahindia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

waterim · 2025-01-21T19:26:25Z

@joekaufmanexpensify @mountiny
Here is a follow up for updating assign card bank connection RHP automatic update screen

joekaufmanexpensify · 2025-01-21T19:53:11Z

TY!

mountiny · 2025-01-21T20:16:17Z

src/pages/workspace/companyCards/assignCard/BankConnection/index.tsx

@@ -31,9 +32,10 @@ function BankConnection({policyID, feed}: BankConnectionStepProps) {
    const styles = useThemeStyles();
    const {translate} = useLocalize();
    const bankName = getBankName(feed);
-    const currentUrl = getCurrentUrl();
-    const isBankConnectionCompleteRoute = currentUrl.includes(ROUTES.BANK_CONNECTION_COMPLETE);


@VickyStash Hmm I am not sure about this change - we basically go back to what we had before, relying on the pusher update to the SHARED_NVP_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_MEMBER but Vicky changed it to use the url - when we complete the connection we should to to the bank-connection-completed route. Why is that not working in this case?

github-actions · 2025-01-21T20:17:30Z

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2025-01-22T14:32:13Z

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test hybrid app build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2025-01-22T14:32:20Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌	❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the Android build failed	The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻	Web 🕸️
N/A	N/A
N/A	N/A

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

github-actions · 2025-01-22T14:43:32Z

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test hybrid app build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2025-01-22T15:18:50Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/55561/index.html	❌ FAILED ❌
	The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻	Web 🕸️
N/A	N/A
N/A	N/A

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

joekaufmanexpensify · 2025-01-22T15:41:57Z

Tested on the adhoc build and it worked well assigning a card from the workspace member profile!

joekaufmanexpensify · 2025-01-22T15:43:22Z

One other bug I did notice is if you add a card feed but haven't assigned cards yet, there is no option to assign cards on any employee's member profile. But as soon as you assign one card, you can assign cards to any employees there. I feel like as soon as you add a card feed, we should show the option to assign cards from the member profile. Thoughts?

2025-01-22_10-08-00.mp4

github-actions · 2025-01-22T16:01:50Z

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test hybrid app build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2025-01-22T16:11:25Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌	❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the Android build failed	The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻	Web 🕸️
N/A	N/A
N/A	N/A

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

github-actions · 2025-01-22T16:20:48Z

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test hybrid app build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2025-01-22T16:30:18Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌	❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the Android build failed	The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻	Web 🕸️
N/A	N/A
N/A	N/A

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

mountiny · 2025-01-22T18:02:21Z

One other bug I did notice is if you add a card feed but haven't assigned cards yet, there is no option to assign cards on any employee's member profile. But as soon as you assign one card, you can assign cards to any employees there. I feel like as soon as you add a card feed, we should show the option to assign cards from the member profile. Thoughts?

Yeah I think that is right, @waterim @narefyev91 is this something you would look into?

mountiny · 2025-01-22T18:08:14Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

mountiny

@joekaufmanexpensify has tested this on the adhoc build so I think we can move this forwards

OSBotify · 2025-01-22T19:00:41Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

waterim · 2025-01-23T07:55:38Z

@mountiny Im taking that bug, will work today on that!

joekaufmanexpensify · 2025-01-23T13:12:09Z

TY!

github-actions · 2025-01-23T18:29:49Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.89-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅

joekaufmanexpensify · 2025-01-24T17:11:40Z

QA passed!

github-actions · 2025-01-28T01:53:17Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.0.89-8 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅

update web behaviour of bank connection

89ab6d0

waterim requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2025 19:25

melvin-bot bot requested review from thesahindia and removed request for a team January 21, 2025 19:25

mountiny added the InternalQA This pull request required internal QA label Jan 21, 2025

mountiny requested changes Jan 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

mountiny assigned waterim Jan 21, 2025

mountiny added the Ready To Build label Jan 21, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

mountiny approved these changes Jan 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

mountiny removed the request for review from thesahindia January 22, 2025 18:09

mountiny merged commit fb5ace6 into Expensify:main Jan 22, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2025

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2025-01-23 #55657

Closed

waterim mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2025

[Internal QA]: Add possibility to assign cards from members page when feeds are configured #55809

Merged

58 tasks

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2025

[Due for payment 2025-02-10] Not prompting to authenticate with the bank if the credentials have expired when assigning cards from workspace member profile. #55104

Open

8 tasks

waterim mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2025

[Internal QA]: Clean up BankConnection components #55888

Open

58 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[Internal QA]: Update web behaviour of bank connection for card assign #55561

[Internal QA]: Update web behaviour of bank connection for card assign #55561

waterim commented Jan 21, 2025 •

edited by mountiny

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 21, 2025

waterim commented Jan 21, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 21, 2025

mountiny Jan 21, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 22, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

mountiny commented Jan 22, 2025

mountiny commented Jan 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading

mountiny left a comment

OSBotify commented Jan 22, 2025

waterim commented Jan 23, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 23, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 24, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

[Internal QA]: Update web behaviour of bank connection for card assign #55561

[Internal QA]: Update web behaviour of bank connection for card assign #55561

Conversation

waterim commented Jan 21, 2025 • edited by mountiny Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 21, 2025

waterim commented Jan 21, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 21, 2025

mountiny Jan 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 22, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

mountiny commented Jan 22, 2025

mountiny commented Jan 22, 2025 • edited Loading

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

OSBotify commented Jan 22, 2025

waterim commented Jan 23, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 23, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2025

joekaufmanexpensify commented Jan 24, 2025

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2025

waterim commented Jan 21, 2025 •

edited by mountiny

Loading

mountiny commented Jan 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading