-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Error message only changes after clicking Split expense button for the second time #42450
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
da3c468
fix: Error message only changes after clicking Split expense button f…
nkdengineer 5560668
fix logic show money request form error
nkdengineer 9f8b638
Merge branch 'main' into fix/41336
nkdengineer 11a896d
Update src/components/MoneyRequestConfirmationList.tsx
nkdengineer 05932cc
Merge branch 'fix/41336' of https://github.com/nkdengineer/App into f…
nkdengineer 4eaa6c3
fix lint
nkdengineer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to confirm that we are not doing this by mistake. It is intentional that we don't check
formErrors
wheniouType !== CONST.IOU.TYPE.PAY
, right?We don't need
inside this
if
. Correct?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aldo-expensify The block after check
formErrors
will do nothing ifiouType !== CONST.IOU.TYPE.PAY
so we don't need to check this for the caseiouType !== CONST.IOU.TYPE.PAY
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which block is that? I'm missing what you are referring to. I see that we do stuff in
iouType !== CONST.IOU.TYPE.PAY
even if there areformErrors
, is that fine? This code will run:right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aldo-expensify That is here. With the change of this PR we only do this after the check
formError
That is the aim of this PR to fix the issue, we should move the logic to setting the error before the check
formError
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, I see what you are saying now, thanks for explaining!