-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Perf: improve camera activation tti #26321
Perf: improve camera activation tti #26321
Conversation
@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM left a few minor comments
|
||
useEffect(() => { | ||
const listenerId = tabPositionAnimation.addListener(({value}) => { | ||
setIsCameraActive(value > 0 && value < 2); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if this is possible, but can we dynamically get the number of tabs so it's less brittle?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this can be done via ._value
but I think we want to close the camera when the user closes the tab so this looks correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, let me update the code, so its dynamic, good call!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made it now dynamic, wdyt?
Co-authored-by: Carlos Martins <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Martins <[email protected]>
@parasharrajat will do checklist on this one soon |
Running checklist. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is testing well! There is still some lag, but i assume its fine as its not really disturbing
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/36083550/5fa0a88c-b68f-4511-b43d-23ec5871ea75
Yes, we can look into further optimising that once visioncamera V3 is out of the door! |
I think @mountiny you will have to ask someone else to finish the checklist on this. My device is running iOS 16.6 and my Xcode 14.2 is not able to build the app for that. I am trying to set it up but it is taking time. |
@parasharrajat Are you able to run Android? I dont have a physical device, I have tested iOS so you dont have to consider that |
Yes, I can test Android. |
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ function MoneyRequestSelectorPage(props) { | |||
<TopTab.Screen | |||
name={CONST.TAB.SCAN} | |||
component={ReceiptSelector} | |||
initialParams={{reportID, iouType}} | |||
initialParams={{reportID, iouType, pageIndex: 1}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems fine for now. But as we use Onyxbased tab selection we should utilize that instead. I agree that tabs are positioned based on number so we should update the OnyxTabnavigator to have these saved with Tab IDs. In short, a more compliant solution might be the one that uses Tab ID instead of index. I hope you understand what I am trying to say here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, do you have any proposal how we'd store the tab ID (index) in the onyx tab navigator state?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see that we are already storing the activeTab in Onyx but we can't use it here as we need the static value of the Screen index. I guess we can use the navigation state for that purpose. Given that we already know the name of the screen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have any immediate idea how to get that from the navigation state. Could you give me a pointer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let me check..
Hmm, the build is failing on Android at buildHermes Step. Trying options. |
So there is a slight delay before the camera is opened but that might be just a dev build. Mainly the camera gets activated while tab is being opened same as the code. |
BUG: Android: The camera stays black when we go back from the Cash page after clicking the photo.
Screenrecorder-2023-08-31-16-08-52-655.mp4 |
@parasharrajat that's on android? Can't reproduce on iOS right now |
Yes, can reproduce on android // Edit: sorry, just seen that you specified its android |
@parasharrajat Can you please re-test? Bug should be fixed |
Awesome thanks. Checking now. |
useEffect(() => { | ||
const removeBlurListener = navigation.addListener('blur', () => { | ||
setIsCameraActive(false); | ||
}); | ||
const removeFocusListener = navigation.addListener('focus', () => { | ||
setIsCameraActive(true); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
return () => { | ||
removeBlurListener(); | ||
removeFocusListener(); | ||
}; | ||
}, [navigation]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can use useFocusEffect
instead of this.
lgtm. |
Screenshots🔲 iOS / nativeThis is the best I could test on iOS. but Mountiny confirmed so I think we are good here. Screen.Recording.2023-08-31.at.11.30.48.PM.mov🔲 iOS / SafariScreen.Recording.2023-08-31.at.11.24.44.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / DesktopScreen.Recording.2023-08-31.at.11.27.58.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / ChromeScreen.Recording.2023-08-31.at.11.21.36.PM.mov🔲 Android / ChromeScreenrecorder-2023-08-31-23-22-32-199.mp4🔲 Android / nativeScreenrecorder-2023-08-31-23-15-55-671.mp4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issues
section above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Tests
section - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA steps
section - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReport
and notonIconClick
). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />
. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*
files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md
) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
have been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
this
properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}
the methodthis.submit
should be bound tothis
in the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
this
are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);
ifthis.submit
is never passed to a component event handler likeonClick
) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG
)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.61-0 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.61-3 🚀
|
Details
This PR includes two fixes to speed up the time until the camera activates:
wide-angle-camera
device, which will be initialised quicker than the device picked by default by vision cameraFor the last point to be possible we need to hook into the tab bar animation value, which is implemented in this PR. We apply a patch currently until its merged:
Fixed Issues
$ #26110
PROPOSAL: #26110 (comment)
Tests
Offline tests
n/a
QA Steps
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issues
section aboveTests
sectionOffline steps
sectionQA steps
sectiontoggleReport
and notonIconClick
)myBool && <MyComponent />
.src/languages/*
files and using the translation methodWaiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.STYLE.md
) were followedAvatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
are working as expected)/** comment above it */
this
properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}
the methodthis.submit
should be bound tothis
in the constructor)this
are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);
ifthis.submit
is never passed to a component event handler likeonClick
)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
)Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases)ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps.Screenshots/Videos
Web
n/a native mobile only change
Mobile Web - Chrome
n/a native mobile only change
Mobile Web - Safari
n/a native mobile only change
Desktop
n/a native mobile only change
iOS
RPReplay_Final1693421736.MP4
Android
(Note: This is on a very weak android device)
SVID_20230830_210747_1.mp4
: