Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable avatar preview for workspace & thread replies #24425

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 15, 2023

Conversation

spcheema
Copy link
Contributor

@spcheema spcheema commented Aug 11, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #21073
PROPOSAL: #21073 (comment)

Tests

Scenario 1:

  1. Select a workspace from LHN and it'll open the workspace report
  2. Click on the workspace report header and the details page will up
  3. Now click on the workspace avatar from RHN (details page)
  4. Click on the workspace avatar to open the avatar preview
  5. Verify the workspace avatar and name on the preview page

Scenario 2:

  1. Select a workspace from LHN and it'll open the workspace report
  2. Send a message in the workspace and click on reply in the thread option
  3. Click the header of the thread and the details page will up
  4. Click on each avatar to open up the avatar preview
  5. Verify avatar and name on the preview page

Scenario 3:

  1. Go to any chat
  2. Send a message and click on reply in the thread option
  3. Click the header of the thread and the details page will up
  4. Click on an avatar to open the avatar preview
  5. Verify avatar and name on the preview page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Scenario 1:

  1. Select a workspace from LHN and it'll open the workspace report
  2. Click on the workspace report header and the details page will up
  3. Now click on the workspace avatar from RHN (details page)
  4. Click on the workspace avatar to open the avatar preview
  5. Verify the workspace avatar and name on the preview page

Scenario 2:

  1. Select a workspace from LHN and it'll open the workspace report
  2. Send a message in the workspace and click on reply in the thread option
  3. Click the header of the thread and and details page will up
  4. Click on each avatar to open up the avatar preview
  5. Verify avatar and name on the preview page

Scenario 3:

  1. Go to any chat
  2. Send a message and click on reply in the thread option
  3. Click the header of the thread and details page will up
  4. Click on an avatar to open the avatar preview
  5. Verify avatar and name on the preview page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile.Web.-.Chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Mobile.-.Safari.mp4
Desktop
Desktop.mp4
iOS
Re_.iOS.-.13.August.2023.mp4
Android
Android.mp4

@spcheema
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif Here is a draft PR. Please have a look and leave your feedback. I'll update screenshots later.

@spcheema spcheema marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2023 13:58
@spcheema spcheema requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2023 13:58
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from aimane-chnaif and removed request for a team August 11, 2023 13:58
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 11, 2023

@aimane-chnaif Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@spcheema
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif I am currently having issues with Android emulator and haven't found any solution yet. I'll update android testing video later.

https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1691972994564499

@spcheema
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif I am currently having issues with Android emulator and haven't found any solution yet. I'll update android testing video later.

https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1691972994564499

Android testing video attached

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv self-requested a review August 14, 2023 14:41
@spcheema
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bumping up for code review @aimane-chnaif

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@spcheema when user sets custom workspace avatar, I think it should show original size to be consistent with custom user avatar

Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.10.04.59.AM.mov

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@spcheema when user sets custom workspace avatar, I think it should show original size to be consistent with custom user avatar

Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.10.04.59.AM.mov

NVM, I confirmed that it's already resized when upload workspace photo. So out of scope

@spcheema
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif That's the max size for the workspace

image

Here is the image I have used

ifJPbUm9XMsQdt7AQAets-1200-80

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

This is minor but hover area doesn't cover full workspace avatar

Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.10.34.06.AM.mov

@spcheema
Copy link
Contributor Author

spcheema commented Aug 15, 2023

This is minor but the hover area doesn't cover the full workspace avatar

Screen.Recording.2023-08-15.at.10.34.06.AM.mov
@aimane-chnaif I have tweaked the pressable container style and it's now covering the full avatar area.

61.New.Expensify.-.15.August.2023.mp4

You may notice 4px hover cover outside the avatar is also clickable. It's due to the 4px border of the avatar container.

image

We can't reduce it otherwise avatars overlap won't be visible

@spcheema spcheema requested a review from aimane-chnaif August 15, 2023 10:41
@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mchrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
msafari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Now workspace avatar preview and user avatar preview look exactly same, no further design confirmation is needed.

Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉
@PauloGasparSv all yours!

Copy link
Contributor

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM to me too and tests great on Web.

Nice catch on separating that margin style too.

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv merged commit 82f06ed into Expensify:main Aug 15, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@spcheema spcheema deleted the fix/21073-show-avatar-preview branch August 16, 2023 11:03
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/PauloGasparSv in version: 1.3.55-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/PauloGasparSv in version: 1.3.56-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.56-24 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

<AttachmentModal
headerTitle={props.icons[0].name}
source={UserUtils.getFullSizeAvatar(props.icons[0].source, props.icons[0].id)}
isAuthTokenRequired
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spcheema @aimane-chnaif

I have a query regarding the isAuthTokenRequired flag set to true for the AttachmentModal component. This flag's setting becomes particularly interesting when compared with the Avatar component's behavior. Both AttachmentModal and Avatar utilize the same image source (props.icons[0].source), yet Avatar manages to load its image without requiring authentication.

This leads me to wonder if there are specific scenarios where authentication is indeed necessary for loading an avatar image. Understanding this is crucial because if authentication is not required in these cases, we might be exposing our authentication tokens to external addresses unnecessarily.

Furthermore, it’s important to consider future updates, particularly regarding the Image component's adaptation to use header-based authentication. Such changes can introduce complexities due to browser security features like CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing). Since avatar sources are not hosted on the same origin, this could potentially lead to CORS errors, disrupting the user experience.

Could you provide insights on the necessity of the isAuthTokenRequired flag in this context? Understanding the rationale behind this decision will help us ensure both secure and efficient handling of image sources across different components.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm also interested - AFAIK the auth tokens were only needed for chat attachments, since these obviously need to be private (only accessible by the participants of a report where the chat attachment was sent). I don't know of / remember a reason we would need any avatars to be private & require auth tokens to fetch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants