Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix QR image show OldDot avatar for a moment after profile avatar being removed #19521

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
May 29, 2023

Conversation

hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@hoangzinh hoangzinh commented May 24, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #19211
PROPOSAL: #19211 (comment)

Tests

On Web/mWeb:

  1. Login app in 2 tabs.
  2. From the first tab open Share QR image
  3. From second tab, try to remove the user avatar.
  4. Focus back to the first tab
  5. Verify that the center QR image should show NewDot default avatar.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-05-24.at.21.27.17.-.web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-05-24.at.22.17.48.-.android.chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-05-24.at.22.25.27.mp4
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-05-24.at.21.45.59.-.desktop.mp4
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-05-24.at.22.29.36.-.ios.mp4
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-05-24.at.22.20.36.-.android.mp4

@hoangzinh hoangzinh marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2023 15:41
@hoangzinh hoangzinh requested a review from a team as a code owner May 24, 2023 15:41
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and tgolen and removed request for a team May 24, 2023 15:41
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 24, 2023

@tgolen @fedirjh One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Comment on lines 725 to 735
function getNewDotDefaultAvatar(login = '') {
if (login === CONST.EMAIL.CONCIERGE) {
return CONST.CONCIERGE_ICON_URL;
}

// There are 24 possible new dot default avatars, so we choose which one this user has based
// on a simple hash of their login. Note that Avatar count starts at 1.
const loginHashBucket = hashLogin(login, CONST.DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT) + 1;

return `${CONST.CLOUDFRONT_URL}/images/avatars/default-avatar_${loginHashBucket}.png`;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hoangzinh This helper function looks same as getOldDotDefaultAvatar , the only diff is the url part default-. To maintain DRY code, maybe we should:

  1. Rename getOldDotDefaultAvatar to getDefaultAvatarURL
  2. Include new parameter , isNewDot and update code accordingly
function getDefaultAvatarURL(login = '',isNewDot=false) {
    if (login === CONST.EMAIL.CONCIERGE) {
        return CONST.CONCIERGE_ICON_URL;
    }
    // There are 8 possible old dot default avatars, so we choose which one this user has based
    // on a simple hash of their login. Note that Avatar count starts at 1.
    const loginHashBucket = hashLogin(login, CONST.OLD_DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT) + 1;
    return `${CONST.CLOUDFRONT_URL}/images/avatars/${isNewDot?'default-':''}avatar_${loginHashBucket}.png`;
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's also diff with number of possible default avatars too. CONST.OLD_DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT vs CONST.DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's reason I decided to make a new method for it. Code will be easier to read w/out branching conditions.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's also diff with number of possible default avatars too. CONST.OLD_DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT vs CONST.DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT

hmm , it could be extracted as well to a new variable

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea. Let me update the PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have updated PR for those default avatar methods. Please you help me review it again. Thanks @fedirjh

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, left minor improvement

// We choose default avatar this user has based on a simple hash of their login.
// Note that Avatar count starts at 1.
const loginHashBucket = hashLogin(login, isNewDot ? CONST.DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT : CONST.OLD_DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT) + 1;
const defaultAvatar = isNewDot ? `default-avatar_${loginHashBucket}` : `avatar_${loginHashBucket}`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const defaultAvatar = isNewDot ? `default-avatar_${loginHashBucket}` : `avatar_${loginHashBucket}`;
const avatarPrefix = isNewDot ? `default-avatar` : `avatar`;

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I updated PR according to above suggestion.


return `${CONST.CLOUDFRONT_URL}/images/avatars/avatar_${loginHashBucket}.png`;
return `${CONST.CLOUDFRONT_URL}/images/avatars/${defaultAvatar}.png`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return `${CONST.CLOUDFRONT_URL}/images/avatars/${defaultAvatar}.png`;
return `${CONST.CLOUDFRONT_URL}/images/avatars/${avatarPrefix}_${loginHashBucket}.png`;

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented May 25, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Safari.mov
Desktop
Dektop.mov
iOS
IOS.mov
Android
Android.mov

fedirjh
fedirjh previously approved these changes May 25, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and test well.

cc @tgolen

src/libs/ReportUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ReportUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
*
* @param {String} [avatarURL] - the avatar source from user's personalDetails
* @param {String} [login] - the email of the user
* @returns {String|Function}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does this return a function? According to JSDocs, avatarURL is a string and getDefaultAvatarURL() returns a string.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry @tgolen copy/paste mistake.

src/libs/ReportUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
isDefaultAvatar,
getOldDotDefaultAvatar,
getDefaultAvatarURL,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO these methods are in the wrong file. Can you move all of the avatar-related functions (that have nothing to do with reports) to UserUtils.js please?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice suggestion btw. I will update it in next commit

Co-authored-by: Tim Golen <[email protected]>
@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh @tgolen

IMO these methods are in the wrong file. Can you move all of the avatar-related functions (that have nothing to do with reports) to UserUtils.js please?

Given the fact that, it will require a bit of effort & touching to multiple files. To avoid it will be getting conflict with other PR touching same LOC, please help me review this PR ASAP. Thanks

tgolen
tgolen previously approved these changes May 25, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh wow, I didn't realize there we so many. Thanks for moving those 🎉

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import ONYXKEYS from '../ONYXKEYS';
import CONST from '../CONST';
import * as Localize from './Localize';
import * as Expensicons from '../components/Icon/Expensicons';
import hashCode from './hashCode';
import hashLogin from './hashLogin';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder why this was import and exported ? maybe we can remove it and update it's usage here , it's only used once in StyleUtils

const colorHash = ReportUtils.hashLogin(workspaceName.trim(), workspaceColorOptions.length);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or it can be moved to userUtils as well and exported from there. What do you think @tgolen ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UserUtils makes sense to me 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch @fedirjh I think we can put this method in UserUtils. I updated PR for this suggestion

fedirjh
fedirjh previously approved these changes May 25, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and tests well

Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, one last thing... I wonder if you agree.

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ function getAvatarBorderStyle(size, type) {
* @returns {Object}
*/
function getDefaultWorkspaceAvatarColor(workspaceName) {
const colorHash = ReportUtils.hashLogin(workspaceName.trim(), workspaceColorOptions.length);
const colorHash = UserUtils.hashLogin(workspaceName.trim(), workspaceColorOptions.length);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This really begs the question if we need this to be in a lib at all. It's one line of code that is only used in one spot. Let's just define it here and keep it out of the utils entirely. This is a good reminder of over-engineering things :D (not you, I'm not sure who originally wrote this).

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh May 25, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm it's used in UserUtils as well

  1. getDefaultAvatarURL
  2. getDefaultAvatar

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tgolen bump for comment above ^

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, OK. I missed that, thanks.

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor Author

hoangzinh commented May 26, 2023

@fedirjh @tgolen hopefully we can merge this PR today 🥺 . I have fix merge conflict several times so I'm worry that It might have resolve conflict mistakes.
Basically for not really big concerns, I can create another following PR to address it.

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Quick bump on it ^

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented May 26, 2023

@hoangzinh you have a lint error

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh all checks is green now.

@tgolen tgolen merged commit 06192ac into Expensify:main May 29, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.3.20-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.3.20-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants